Head-to-Head Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (4)
DeepSeekAnthropicreasoningflagship

Compare DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B by DeepSeek against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Modelo de Pesos Abertos

O DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B da DeepSeek é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 131K tokens e preço de API de $0.2/1M na entrada e $0.6/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

51.2%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Modelo de Raciocínio Profundo

O Claude Opus 5.5 da Anthropic é um modelo de inteligência artificial com janela de contexto de 1M tokens e preço de API de $4.0/1M na entrada e $20.0/1M na saída, projetado para programação, raciocínio e automação empresarial.

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 28.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 131K tokens).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 is faster at 78 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 51.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureDeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BClaude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4694
Provider
DeepSeekAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.60 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.11 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
58 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
51.2%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
65.9%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+33.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B
28.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Claude Opus 5.5
+34% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 5.5
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BClaude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

51.2%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

65.9%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75.3%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1308ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

9.4%vs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

31%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

37.1%vs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

57.2%vs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

72.6%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68.4%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

58 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B0.76s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B9.38s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B Monthly API Bill
$0.87 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.6/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B saves approximately $23.73 / month (96%) under this workload.28.3x Savings

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Arquitetura Dense Distilled Reasoning Transformer avançada da DeepSeek com contexto de 131K tokens
  • Excelente relação custo-benefício ($0.2/1M entrada, $0.6/1M saída) e baixa latência
  • Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
  • Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Arquitetura Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer avançada da Anthropic com contexto de 1M tokens
  • Excelente relação custo-benefício ($4.0/1M entrada, $20.0/1M saída) e baixa latência
  • Forte desempenho em benchmarks de código, análise lógica e tarefas multilíngues
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Cargas de trabalho com contexto máximo exigem monitoramento de custos de tokens
  • Requer engenharia de prompt adequada para fluxos de trabalho altamente específicos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricDeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BClaude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.26$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
19K42K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureDeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32BClaude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)deepseek-reasonerclaude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-012026-09
Knowledge CutoffJuly 2024June 2026
ArchitectureDense Distilled Reasoning TransformerExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
Parameters32BConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 131K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.02/1M (no extra cache-write fee)$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Claude Opus 5.5: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude Opus 5.5 is faster, generating 78 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper at $0.11 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.76s compared with 1.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Veredito

Choose DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B for automação corporativa, engenharia de software, agentes autônomos e pipelines de produção com deepseek, or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for automação corporativa, engenharia de software, agentes autônomos e pipelines de produção com anthropic.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Claude Opus 5.5?+

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.2/1M input and $0.6/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Claude Opus 5.5?+

DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 131K tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: DeepSeek & Anthropic Official Documentation