Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Command R7B vs Llama 3.3 70B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial

Partilhar

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Command R7BProfile

Llama 3.3 70BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Cohere

Command R7B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Command R7B da Cohere é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 140 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 38/100 e tari

Intelligence Index38 / 100

Input Token:

$0.07 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

27%

Llama 3.3 70B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Llama 3.3 70B da Meta é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 280 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 38/100 e tari

Intelligence Index38 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

39.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

Llama 3.3 70B is 2.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Llama 3.3 70B is faster at 280 tok/s vs 140 tok/s.
Llama 3.3 70B leads on SWE-bench coding (39.5% vs 27.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Command R7B	Llama 3.3 70B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	38	38
Provider	Cohere	Meta
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.07 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.20 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.05 / 1M	$0.07 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	4K	4K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	140 tok/s	280 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	27%	39.5%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	42.5%	48.9%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.02 / 1M	$0.10 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Llama 3.3 70B

+12.5% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Llama 3.3 70B

2.1x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Llama 3.3 70B

+100% faster generation

Context

Tied

128K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Command R7BLlama 3.3 70B

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

27%vs39.5%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

42.5%vs48.9%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

66%vs71%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1215ptsvs1285pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs7.8%

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs26.1%

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs23.7%

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs42.5%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs56.2%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

68%vs63.9%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

140 tok/s vs280 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Command R7B0.29s

Llama 3.3 70B0.25s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Command R7B3.86s

Llama 3.3 70B2.04s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Command R7B Monthly API Bill

$0.32 / month

$0.07/1M in · $0.2/1M out

Llama 3.3 70B Monthly API Bill

$0.15 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Llama 3.3 70B saves approximately $0.17 / month (52%) under this workload.2.1x Savings

Command R7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 27% · GPQA Diamond 42.5%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 140 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 290 ms
Pesos abertos (7B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Llama 3.3 70B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 39.5% · GPQA Diamond 48.9%)
Taxa de transferência rápida de 280 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 250 ms
Pesos abertos (70B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Command R7B	Llama 3.3 70B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.05	$0.21
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	20K	45K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	0K	0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Command R7B	Llama 3.3 70B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	command-r7b	meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2024-12	2024-12
Knowledge Cutoff	October 2024	December 2023
Architecture	Efficient Compact RAG Transformer	Dense Autoregressive Transformer
Parameters	7B	70B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.07/1M in) across full 128K window	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.02/1M tokens	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 4 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 15 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text
Output Modalities	text	text

Command R7B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which model is faster?

Llama 3.3 70B is faster, generating 280 tokens per second compared with 140 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Command R7B is cheaper at $0.05 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.07 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 3.3 70B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.25s compared with 0.29s.

Veredito

Tanto Command R7B (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Llama 3.3 70B (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Command R7B lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Llama 3.3 70B oferece geração mais rápida e Command R7B apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Command R7B ou Llama 3.3 70B?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Command R7B leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Command R7B ou Llama 3.3 70B?+

O Command R7B custa $0.07 / $0.20 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Llama 3.3 70B custa $0.00 / $0.00. No custo combinado, Command R7B é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Command R7B suporta 128K tokens de contexto contra 128K tokens do Llama 3.3 70B, enquanto Llama 3.3 70B entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Command R7B vs Llama 3.3 70B

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Command R7B

Llama 3.3 70B

Quem vence em cada categoria?

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Command R7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Llama 3.3 70B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificações Técnicas

Command R7B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredito

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Related reading