Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Command R7B Arabic vs Command R7B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Command R7B Arabic vs Command R7B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Command R7B Arabic da Cohere e Command R7B da Cohere são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Command R7B Arabic oferece uma janela de contexto de 128K tokens a $0.07/$0.20 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Command R7B oferece 128K tokens de contexto a $0.07/$0.20 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Cohere

Command R7B Arabic

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Command R7B Arabic da Cohere é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 135 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 39/100

Intelligence Index39 / 100
Input Token:

$0.07 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

26%

Cohere

Command R7B

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Command R7B da Cohere é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 140 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 38/100 e tari

Intelligence Index38 / 100
Input Token:

$0.07 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

27%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
  • Command R7B is faster at 140 tok/s vs 135 tok/s.
  • Command R7B leads on SWE-bench coding (27.0% vs 26.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureCommand R7B ArabicCommand R7B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3938
Provider
CohereCohere
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.07 / 1M$0.07 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.20 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.05 / 1M$0.05 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
4K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
135 tok/s140 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
26%27%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
43%42.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.02 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Command R7B
+1.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Tied
Identical monthly runtime cost
Speed
Command R7B
+4% faster generation
Context
Tied
128K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Command R7B ArabicCommand R7B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

26%vs27%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

43%vs42.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

67%vs66%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1225ptsvs1215pts
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

70%vs68%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

135 tok/s vs140 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Command R7B Arabic0.31s
Command R7B0.29s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Command R7B Arabic4.01s
Command R7B3.86s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Command R7B Arabic Monthly API Bill
$0.32 / month
$0.07/1M in · $0.2/1M out
Command R7B Monthly API Bill
$0.32 / month
$0.07/1M in · $0.2/1M out
These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Command R7B Arabic · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 26% · GPQA Diamond 43%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 135 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 310 ms
  • Pesos abertos (7B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Command R7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 27% · GPQA Diamond 42.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 140 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 290 ms
  • Pesos abertos (7B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricCommand R7B ArabicCommand R7B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.05$0.05
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
20K20K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureCommand R7B ArabicCommand R7B
Official API Model ID (SDK)command-r7b-arabiccommand-r7b
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-022024-12
Knowledge CutoffDecember 2024October 2024
ArchitectureArabic-Specialized RAG TransformerEfficient Compact RAG Transformer
Parameters7B7B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.07/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($0.07/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.02/1M tokensCached input at $0.02/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 4 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 15 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 4 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 15 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Command R7B Arabic vs Command R7B: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Command R7B Arabic or Command R7B?

Command R7B Arabic is more intelligent. It scores 39 compared with 38 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Command R7B is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 135 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Command R7B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.29s compared with 0.31s.

Veredito

Tanto Command R7B Arabic (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Command R7B (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Command R7B Arabic lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Command R7B oferece geração mais rápida e Command R7B Arabic apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Command R7B Arabic ou Command R7B?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Command R7B Arabic leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Command R7B Arabic ou Command R7B?+

O Command R7B Arabic custa $0.07 / $0.20 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Command R7B custa $0.07 / $0.20. No custo combinado, Command R7B Arabic é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Command R7B Arabic suporta 128K tokens de contexto contra 128K tokens do Command R7B, enquanto Command R7B entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Cohere e Cohere e benchmarks independentes (2026).