Command A Translate vs Command A Vision
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Command A Translate da Cohere e Command A Vision da Cohere são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Command A Translate oferece uma janela de contexto de 8.2K tokens a $0.20/$0.40 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Command A Vision oferece 128K tokens de contexto a $2.50/$10.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.
Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Command A Translate
Modelo Leve e EconômicoO Command A Translate da Cohere é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 8K, velocidade de 130 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 40/100 e tarifa d
$0.20 / 1M
$0.40 / 1M
8.2K tokens
N/A
Command A Vision
IA Multimodal NativaO Command A Vision da Cohere é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 53/100
$2.50 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
128K tokens
45%
Principais Diferenças em Resumo
- Command A Translate is 18.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Command A Vision has a larger context window (128K vs 8K tokens).
- Command A Translate is faster at 130 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
| Feature | Command A Translate | Command A Vision |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 40 | 53 |
Provider | Cohere | Cohere |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.11 / 1M | $2.02 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 130 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 45% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 62.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.05 / 1M | $0.75 / 1M |
Quem vence em cada categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latência e Tempo de Resposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Command A Translate · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Janela de contexto de 8K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (MMLU-Pro 68% · Arena Elo 1235)
- Taxa de transferência rápida de 130 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 320 ms
- Pesos abertos (Confidential (~14B)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
- Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade
Command A Vision · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 45% · GPQA Diamond 62.5%)
- Taxa de transferência rápida de 65 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 550 ms
- Pesos abertos (Confidential (~110B+)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
- Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Command A Translate | Command A Vision |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.04 | $0.80 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 38K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Especificações Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Command A Translate | Command A Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | command-a-translate | command-a-vision |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-08 | 2025-07 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | June 2025 | May 2025 |
| Architecture | Specialized Enterprise Neural Translation Transformer | Enterprise Multimodal Agent Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential (~14B) | Confidential (~110B+) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 8K window | Flat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.05/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.75/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 9 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 30 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 68 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 237 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Command A Translate vs Command A Vision: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Command A Translate or Command A Vision?
Command A Vision is more intelligent. It scores 53 compared with 40 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Command A Translate is faster, generating 130 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Command A Translate is cheaper at $0.11 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.02 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Command A Translate has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.32s compared with 0.55s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Command A Vision has a larger context window, supporting 128K tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.
Veredito
Tanto Command A Translate (Indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Command A Vision (Indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Command A Vision lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Command A Translate oferece geração mais rápida e Command A Translate apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.
Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)
Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Command A Translate ou Command A Vision?+
Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Command A Vision leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.
Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Command A Translate ou Command A Vision?+
O Command A Translate custa $0.20 / $0.40 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Command A Vision custa $2.50 / $10.00. No custo combinado, Command A Translate é mais econômico.
Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+
O Command A Translate suporta 8.2K tokens de contexto contra 128K tokens do Command A Vision, enquanto Command A Translate entrega maior velocidade de geração.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Command A Translate vs. Mistral Small 3.2: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Command A Vision vs. Command A: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Command A Vision vs. Gemma 3n: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aion-3.0 vs. Aion-Mini: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aion-3.0 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aion-Mini vs. Laguna XS 2.1: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Cohere e Cohere e benchmarks independentes (2026).