Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
IA Agêntica e Uso de FerramentasO Claude 3.5 Haiku da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, oferecendo janela de contexto de 200K, velocidade de 130 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 36/100
$0.80 / 1M
$4.00 / 1M
200K tokens
40.6%
Gemini 4 Argon
IA Multimodal NativaO Gemini 4 Argon da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 115 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 97/100 e
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
Principais Diferenças em Resumo
- Claude 3.5 Haiku is 2.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
- Claude 3.5 Haiku is faster at 130 tok/s vs 115 tok/s.
- Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 40.6%).
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 36 | 97 |
Provider | Anthropic | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.80 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $4.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.62 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 130 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 40.6% | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 41.6% | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.08 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Quem vence em cada categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latência e Tempo de Resposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Claude 3.5 Haiku · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Janela de contexto de 200K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 40.6% · GPQA Diamond 41.6%)
- Taxa de transferência rápida de 130 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 380 ms
- Economia de API competitiva ($0.8/$4 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
- Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 1M tokens (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
- Taxa de transferência rápida de 115 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
- Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
- Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.90 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 36K |
Especificações Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | claude-3-5-haiku-20241101 | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2024-11 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | July 2024 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Optimized Lightweight Transformer | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | $0.08/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 36 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is faster, generating 130 tokens per second compared with 115 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper at $0.62 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 200K tokens.
Veredito
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for indicado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas rag corporativas e integração escalável via api..
Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.8/1M input and $4/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs. Aion-Mini: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aion-3.0 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aion-Mini vs. Laguna XS 2.1: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aya Expanse 32B vs. Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs. Command R+: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Aya Expanse 8B vs. Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fontes oficiais: Anthropic & Google Official Documentation