Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

GPT-6 SolProfile

Claude Sonnet 5.5Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol

플래그십 프론티어 모델

OpenAI의 GPT-6 Sol 모델은 최첨단 엔터프라이즈 추론, 소프트웨어 개발 및 핵심 프로덕션 워크로드에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 1M 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 116 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 93/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $2 / 출력 $10)을 제공합니다.

Intelligence Index93 / 100

Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.1%

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5.5

플래그십 프론티어 모델

Anthropic의 Claude Sonnet 5.5 모델은 최첨단 엔터프라이즈 추론, 소프트웨어 개발 및 핵심 프로덕션 워크로드에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 1M 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 105 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 78/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $2 / 출력 $10)을 제공합니다.

Intelligence Index78 / 100

Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.9%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

GPT-6 Sol is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
GPT-6 Sol is faster at 116 tok/s vs 105 tok/s.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (82.9% vs 82.1%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	GPT-6 Sol	Claude Sonnet 5.5
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	93	78
Provider	OpenAI	Anthropic
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$2.00 / 1M	$2.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$10.00 / 1M	$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$1.47 / 1M	$1.54 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	128K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	116 tok/s	105 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	82.1%	82.9%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	80.6%	79.4%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.10 / 1M	$0.20 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Claude Sonnet 5.5

+0.8% SWE-bench lead

Cost

GPT-6 Sol

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

GPT-6 Sol

+10% faster generation

Context

Tied

1M tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

82.1%vs82.9%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

80.6%vs79.4%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.8%vs90.1%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1516ptsvs1490pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18%vsN/A

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

63.2%vs58.9%

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

54.5%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

79.5%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

93.4%vsN/A

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

90.8%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

116 tok/s vs105 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

GPT-6 Sol1.16s

Claude Sonnet 5.50.55s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

GPT-6 Sol5.47s

Claude Sonnet 5.55.31s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

GPT-6 Sol Monthly API Bill

$12.15 / month

$2/1M in · $10/1M out

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Monthly API Bill

$12.30 / month

$2/1M in · $10/1M out

GPT-6 Sol saves approximately $0.15 / month (1%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT-6 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

1M 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 128K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 82.1% · GPQA Diamond 80.6%)
초당 116 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 1160ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
합리적인 API 요금 체계(1M 토큰당 입력 $2 / 출력 $10)와 프롬프트 캐싱, 함수 호출 및 정형화된 JSON 출력 완벽 지원

Considerations & Trade-offs

독점 클라우드 전용 모델로 로컬 오프라인 서버에 가중치를 다운로드하여 실행할 수 없습니다
대규모 프로덕션 호출 환경에서는 비용 절감을 위해 프롬프트 캐싱과 배치 API(Batch API) 활용이 권장됩니다

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

1M 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 128K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 82.9% · GPQA Diamond 79.4%)
초당 105 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 550ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
합리적인 API 요금 체계(1M 토큰당 입력 $2 / 출력 $10)와 프롬프트 캐싱, 함수 호출 및 정형화된 JSON 출력 완벽 지원

Considerations & Trade-offs

독점 클라우드 전용 모델로 로컬 오프라인 서버에 가중치를 다운로드하여 실행할 수 없습니다
대규모 프로덕션 호출 환경에서는 비용 절감을 위해 프롬프트 캐싱과 배치 API(Batch API) 활용이 권장됩니다

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	GPT-6 Sol	Claude Sonnet 5.5
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$2.00	$3.29
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	62K	72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	36K	37K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	GPT-6 Sol	Claude Sonnet 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)	gpt-6-sol	claude-sonnet-5-5-20260901
API Protocol	OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date	2026-09	2026-09
Knowledge Cutoff	April 2026	June 2026
Architecture	Cost-efficient frontier unified reasoning model	Adaptive Frontier Multimodal Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)	$0.2/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-6 Sol or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

GPT-6 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 78 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6 Sol is faster, generating 116 tokens per second compared with 105 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-6 Sol is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.54 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.55s compared with 1.16s.

종합 평가

GPT-6 Sol(최첨단 엔터프라이즈 추론, 소프트웨어 개발 및 핵심 프로덕션 워크로드, 엔터프라이즈 RAG 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 API 연동에 최적.)와 Claude Sonnet 5.5(최첨단 엔터프라이즈 추론, 소프트웨어 개발 및 핵심 프로덕션 워크로드, 엔터프라이즈 RAG 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 API 연동에 최적.) 모두 뛰어난 성능을 자랑합니다. 고난도 추론과 코딩 벤치마크에서는 GPT-6 Sol가 앞서며, 토큰 생성 속도에서는 GPT-6 Sol가 빠르고, 대규모 API 운영 비용 면에서는 GPT-6 Sol가 더 경제적입니다.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

코딩과 복잡한 추론에는 GPT-6 Sol와 Claude Sonnet 5.5 중 어느 모델이 더 나은가요?+

종합 지능 지수 및 코딩 벤치마크에서는 GPT-6 Sol가 우위를 보입니다. 상단의 SWE-bench 및 GPQA 점수를 함께 확인해 보세요.

GPT-6 Sol와 Claude Sonnet 5.5의 API 요금 차이는 얼마인가요?+

GPT-6 Sol는 100만 토큰당 입력 $2.00 / 출력 $10.00이며, Claude Sonnet 5.5는 입력 $2.00 / 출력 $10.00입니다. 혼합 비용 기준으로는 GPT-6 Sol가 더 저렴합니다.

어느 모델이 더 큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 빠른 속도를 제공하나요?+

컨텍스트 길이는 GPT-6 Sol가 1M 토큰, Claude Sonnet 5.5가 1M 토큰를 지원하며, 출력 속도 면에서는 GPT-6 Sol가 더 빠릅니다.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

GPT-6 Sol

Claude Sonnet 5.5

부문별 우위 모델

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

GPT-6 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

기술 사양 (Specifications)

GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

종합 평가

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

Related reading