Qwen3.5 Plus vs Claude Opus 5.5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Qwen3.5 Plus by Alibaba against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
任意のAIモデルを切り替えて比較
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Qwen3.5 Plus
ネイティブ・マルチモーダルAIAlibaba の Qwen3.5 Plus は、テキストと画像のネイティブ・マルチモーダル理解および図表・ドキュメント解析向けに設計されたAIモデルです。1M のコンテキストウィンドウ、毎秒 85 トークンの生成速度、知能指数 87/100（1Mトークンあたり入力$0.6・出力$2.4）を実現しています。
$0.60 / 1M
$2.40 / 1M
1M tokens
64%
Claude Opus 5.5
フラッグシップ最先端モデルAnthropic の Claude Opus 5.5 は、最先端のエンタープライズ推論、ソフトウェア工学、ミッションクリティカルな本番運用向けに設計されたAIモデルです。1M のコンテキストウィンドウ、毎秒 78 トークンの生成速度、知能指数 94/100（1Mトークンあたり入力$4・出力$20）を実現しています。
$4.00 / 1M
$20.00 / 1M
1M tokens
84.6%
ひと目でわかる主な違い
- Qwen3.5 Plus is 7.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen3.5 Plus is faster at 85 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
- Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 64.0%).
| Feature | Qwen3.5 Plus | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 87 | 94 |
Provider | Alibaba | Anthropic |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.60 / 1M | $4.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $2.40 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.40 / 1M | $3.08 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 78 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 64% | 84.6% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 72% | 82.3% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.06 / 1M | $0.40 / 1M |
分野別勝者スコアカード
At-a-glance decision framework検証済みベンチマークスコア比較
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
レイテンシ＆応答時間
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
リアルタイムAPIトークン料金シミュレーター
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Qwen3.5 Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 1M のコンテキストウィンドウと最大 16K トークンの出力容量（SWE-bench Verified 64% · GPQA Diamond 72%）
- 毎秒 85 トークンの高速スループットと、初回トークン到達時間（TTFT）わずか 490ms の低遅延
- 優れたAPI経済性（1Mトークンあたり入力$0.6・出力$2.4）に加え、プロンプトキャッシュや構造化JSON出力・関数呼び出しに完全対応
Considerations & Trade-offs
- クラウド専用のプロプライエタリモデルのため、モデル重みをダウンロードしてオフライン実行することはできません
- 極めて高度な専門科学の証明問題では、上位の大型推論特化モデルの方がより深い洞察を提供する場合があります
Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 1M のコンテキストウィンドウと最大 128K トークンの出力容量（SWE-bench Verified 84.6% · GPQA Diamond 82.3%）
- 毎秒 78 トークンの高速スループットと、初回トークン到達時間（TTFT）わずか 1400ms の低遅延
- 優れたAPI経済性（1Mトークンあたり入力$4・出力$20）に加え、プロンプトキャッシュや構造化JSON出力・関数呼び出しに完全対応
Considerations & Trade-offs
- クラウド専用のプロプライエタリモデルのため、モデル重みをダウンロードしてオフライン実行することはできません
- 大量のトークンを処理する本番環境では、プロンプトキャッシュや Batch API の併用によるコスト最適化が推奨されます
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 Plus | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.19 | $3.85 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 68K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 8K | 42K |
技術仕様・スペック
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Qwen3.5 Plus | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwen3-5-plus-instruct | claude-opus-5-5-20260901 |
| API Protocol | Alibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI |
| Release Date | 2026-02 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | December 2025 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Enterprise Million-Token Multimodal Transformer | Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.6/1M in) across full 1000K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.06/1M tokens | $0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Alibaba Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Qwen3.5 Plus vs Claude Opus 5.5: よくある質問 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Qwen3.5 Plus or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 87 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen3.5 Plus is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen3.5 Plus has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.49s compared with 1.40s.
総合評価
Choose Qwen3.5 Plus for テキストと画像のネイティブ・マルチモーダル理解および図表・ドキュメント解析、エンタープライズrag基盤、スケーラブルな本番api統合に最適。, or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for 最先端のエンタープライズ推論、ソフトウェア工学、ミッションクリティカルな本番運用、エンタープライズrag基盤、スケーラブルな本番api統合に最適。.
よくある質問 (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Qwen3.5 Plus or Claude Opus 5.5?+
Qwen3.5 Plus costs $0.6/1M input and $2.4/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Qwen3.5 Plus or Claude Opus 5.5?+
Qwen3.5 Plus supports 1M tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
公的ソース: Alibaba & Anthropic Official Documentation