Head-to-Head Model Comparison

North Mini Code vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs リサーチチーム監修最終確認日: October 2026編集方針
共有
Related topics (4)
CohereGoogleopen-sourceflagship

Compare North Mini Code by Cohere against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

徹底比較 (VS)

任意のAIモデルを切り替えて比較

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Cohere

North Mini Code

オープンウェイトモデル

Cohere が提供する North Mini Code は、最大 256K トークンのコンテキストウィンドウを備え、入力 $0.2/100万トークン・出力 $0.6/100万トークンで利用可能な、コーディング・推論・業務自動化向け AI モデルです。

Intelligence Index47 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

45%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

高度な推論モデル

Google が提供する Gemini 4 Argon は、最大 1M トークンのコンテキストウィンドウを備え、入力 $2/100万トークン・出力 $10/100万トークンで利用可能な、コーディング・推論・業務自動化向け AI モデルです。

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

ひと目でわかる主な違い

  • North Mini Code is 13.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
  • North Mini Code is faster at 125 tok/s vs 115 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 45.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNorth Mini CodeGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4797
Provider
CohereGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.60 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.13 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
125 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
45%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
55%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.04 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

分野別勝者スコアカード

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+36.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
North Mini Code
13.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
North Mini Code
+9% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

検証済みベンチマークスコア比較

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

North Mini CodeGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

45%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

55%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1320ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

40%vs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

68%vs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80%vs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

125 tok/s vs115 tok/s

レイテンシ&応答時間

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
North Mini Code0.32s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
North Mini Code4.32s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

リアルタイムAPIトークン料金シミュレーター

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
North Mini Code Monthly API Bill
$0.90 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.6/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
North Mini Code saves approximately $11.25 / month (93%) under this workload.13.5x Savings

North Mini Code · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Cohere の高度な Code-Specialized Autoregressive Transformer アーキテクチャと 256K トークンのコンテキスト処理能力
  • 優れたコストパフォーマンス(入力 $0.2/1M、出力 $0.6/1M)と安定した応答速度
  • プログラミング、論理的推論、多言語タスクにおいて高いベンチマーク精度を実現
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 大規模な長文コンテキスト処理時はトークン消費量の最適化が必要
  • 専門領域のタスクでは適切なプロンプト設計や RAG の併用が推奨される

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Google の高度な Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts アーキテクチャと 1M トークンのコンテキスト処理能力
  • 優れたコストパフォーマンス(入力 $2/1M、出力 $10/1M)と安定した応答速度
  • プログラミング、論理的推論、多言語タスクにおいて高いベンチマーク精度を実現
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 大規模な長文コンテキスト処理時はトークン消費量の最適化が必要
  • 専門領域のタスクでは適切なプロンプト設計や RAG の併用が推奨される

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNorth Mini CodeGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.15$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
30K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
12K36K

技術仕様・スペック

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNorth Mini CodeGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)north-mini-codemodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-062026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026June 2026
ArchitectureCode-Specialized Autoregressive TransformerPathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidential (~20B)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 256K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.04/1M tokensImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 12 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 43 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

North Mini Code vs Gemini 4 Argon: よくある質問 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, North Mini Code or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 47 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

North Mini Code is faster, generating 125 tokens per second compared with 115 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

North Mini Code is cheaper at $0.13 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

North Mini Code has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.32s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 256K tokens.

総合評価

Choose North Mini Code for エンタープライズ自動化、ソフトウェア開発、ai エージェント構築、cohere エコシステムの統合, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for エンタープライズ自動化、ソフトウェア開発、ai エージェント構築、google エコシステムの統合.

よくある質問 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: North Mini Code or Gemini 4 Argon?+

North Mini Code costs $0.2/1M input and $0.6/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: North Mini Code or Gemini 4 Argon?+

North Mini Code supports 256K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

公的ソース: Cohere & Google Official Documentation