Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs リサーチチーム監修最終確認日: October 2026編集方針
共有
Related topics (4)
Mistral AIAnthropicopen-sourceflagship

Compare Mistral Small 3 by Mistral AI against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

徹底比較 (VS)

任意のAIモデルを切り替えて比較

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mistral Small 3

オープンウェイトモデル

Mistral AI が提供する Mistral Small 3 は、最大 32K トークンのコンテキストウィンドウを備え、入力 $0.1/100万トークン・出力 $0.3/100万トークンで利用可能な、コーディング・推論・業務自動化向け AI モデルです。

Intelligence Index41 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Context Window:

32K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

31.5%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

高度な推論モデル

Anthropic が提供する Claude Opus 5.5 は、最大 1M トークンのコンテキストウィンドウを備え、入力 $4.0/100万トークン・出力 $20.0/100万トークンで利用可能な、コーディング・推論・業務自動化向け AI モデルです。

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

ひと目でわかる主な違い

  • Mistral Small 3 is 49.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 32K tokens).
  • Mistral Small 3 is faster at 105 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 31.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMistral Small 3Claude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4194
Provider
Mistral AIAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.30 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.09 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
32K tokens~48 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
105 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
31.5%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
46.5%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.05 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

分野別勝者スコアカード

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+53.1% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Mistral Small 3
49.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Mistral Small 3
+35% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 5.5
1M tokens window

検証済みベンチマークスコア比較

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mistral Small 3Claude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

31.5%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

46.5%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

70.2%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1238ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

27%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

52%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

64%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

105 tok/s vs78 tok/s

レイテンシ&応答時間

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mistral Small 30.38s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mistral Small 35.14s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

リアルタイムAPIトークン料金シミュレーター

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mistral Small 3 Monthly API Bill
$0.50 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.3/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
Mistral Small 3 saves approximately $24.11 / month (98%) under this workload.49.7x Savings

Mistral Small 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Mistral AI の高度な Compact Dense Transformer アーキテクチャと 32K トークンのコンテキスト処理能力
  • 優れたコストパフォーマンス(入力 $0.1/1M、出力 $0.3/1M)と安定した応答速度
  • プログラミング、論理的推論、多言語タスクにおいて高いベンチマーク精度を実現
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 大規模な長文コンテキスト処理時はトークン消費量の最適化が必要
  • 専門領域のタスクでは適切なプロンプト設計や RAG の併用が推奨される

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Anthropic の高度な Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer アーキテクチャと 1M トークンのコンテキスト処理能力
  • 優れたコストパフォーマンス(入力 $4.0/1M、出力 $20.0/1M)と安定した応答速度
  • プログラミング、論理的推論、多言語タスクにおいて高いベンチマーク精度を実現
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 大規模な長文コンテキスト処理時はトークン消費量の最適化が必要
  • 専門領域のタスクでは適切なプロンプト設計や RAG の併用が推奨される

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMistral Small 3Claude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.08$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K42K

技術仕様・スペック

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMistral Small 3Claude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)mistral-small-3-latestclaude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-012026-09
Knowledge CutoffDecember 2024June 2026
ArchitectureCompact Dense TransformerExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
Parameters24BConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 32K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.05/1M tokens$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 15 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 52 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mistral Small 3 vs Claude Opus 5.5: よくある質問 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mistral Small 3 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 41 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mistral Small 3 is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.09 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral Small 3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 1.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 32K tokens.

総合評価

Choose Mistral Small 3 for エンタープライズ自動化、ソフトウェア開発、ai エージェント構築、mistral ai エコシステムの統合, or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for エンタープライズ自動化、ソフトウェア開発、ai エージェント構築、anthropic エコシステムの統合.

よくある質問 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Mistral Small 3 or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Mistral Small 3 costs $0.1/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Mistral Small 3 or Claude Opus 5.5?+

Mistral Small 3 supports 32K tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

公的ソース: Mistral AI & Anthropic Official Documentation