Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs GPT-6 Astra
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision by Meta against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
任意のAIモデルを切り替えて比較
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
ネイティブ・マルチモーダルAIMeta の Llama 3.2 11B Vision は、テキストと画像のネイティブ・マルチモーダル理解および図表・ドキュメント解析向けに設計されたAIモデルです。128K のコンテキストウィンドウ、毎秒 120 トークンの生成速度、知能指数 66/100（無料のオープンウェイト提供）を実現しています。
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
GPT-6 Astra
音声・スピーチAIモデルOpenAI の GPT-6 Astra は、自然な音声合成（TTS）、リアルタイム音声対話、高精度な文字起こし向けに設計されたAIモデルです。272K のコンテキストウィンドウ、毎秒 100 トークンの生成速度、知能指数 96/100（1Mトークンあたり入力$10・出力$50）を実現しています。
$10.00 / 1M
$50.00 / 1M
272K tokens
82.4%
ひと目でわかる主な違い
- Llama 3.2 11B Vision is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 128K tokens).
- Llama 3.2 11B Vision is faster at 120 tok/s vs 100 tok/s.
| Feature | Llama 3.2 11B Vision | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 66 | 96 |
Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $7.70 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 120 tok/s | 100 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 82.4% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 80.9% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
分野別勝者スコアカード
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
検証済みベンチマークスコア比較
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
レイテンシ＆応答時間
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
リアルタイムAPIトークン料金シミュレーター
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 128K のコンテキストウィンドウと最大 4K トークンの出力容量（MMLU-Pro 68% · Arena Elo 1285）
- 毎秒 120 トークンの高速スループットと、初回トークン到達時間（TTFT）わずか 310ms の低遅延
- オープンウェイトモデル (11B)として vLLM・SGLang・Ollama を用いた自社GPUでのローカル運用が可能
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 非量子化のフル精度でローカル推論を行うには十分なGPU VRAM容量が必要です
- 極めて高度な専門科学の証明問題では、上位の大型推論特化モデルの方がより深い洞察を提供する場合があります
GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 272K のコンテキストウィンドウと最大 128K トークンの出力容量（SWE-bench Verified 82.4% · GPQA Diamond 80.9%）
- 毎秒 100 トークンの高速スループットと、初回トークン到達時間（TTFT）わずか 950ms の低遅延
- 優れたAPI経済性（1Mトークンあたり入力$10・出力$50）に加え、プロンプトキャッシュや構造化JSON出力・関数呼び出しに完全対応
Considerations & Trade-offs
- クラウド専用のプロプライエタリモデルのため、モデル重みをダウンロードしてオフライン実行することはできません
- 大量のトークンを処理する本番環境では、プロンプトキャッシュや Batch API の併用によるコスト最適化が推奨されます
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Llama 3.2 11B Vision | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $2.15 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 3K | 58K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 32K |
技術仕様・スペック
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Llama 3.2 11B Vision | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision | gpt-6-astra |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2024-09 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | December 2023 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Multimodal cross-attention vision-language transformer | Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT |
| Parameters | 11B | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 7 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 24 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text, audio |
Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs GPT-6 Astra: よくある質問 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Llama 3.2 11B Vision or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 66 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Llama 3.2 11B Vision is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 100 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 3.2 11B Vision is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Llama 3.2 11B Vision has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.31s compared with 0.95s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
総合評価
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Vision for テキストと画像のネイティブ・マルチモーダル理解および図表・ドキュメント解析、エンタープライズrag基盤、スケーラブルな本番api統合に最適。, or choose GPT-6 Astra for 自然な音声合成（tts）、リアルタイム音声対話、高精度な文字起こし、エンタープライズrag基盤、スケーラブルな本番api統合に最適。.
よくある質問 (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Llama 3.2 11B Vision or GPT-6 Astra?+
Llama 3.2 11B Vision costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Llama 3.2 11B Vision or GPT-6 Astra?+
Llama 3.2 11B Vision supports 128K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct：ベンチマーク・API料金・速度の徹底比較 (2026)比較
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
公的ソース: Meta & OpenAI Official Documentation