Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Aya Expanse 8B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs リサーチチーム監修最終確認日: October 2026編集方針
共有
Related topics (4)
GoogleCohereflagshipopen-source

Compare Gemini 4 Argon by Google against Aya Expanse 8B by Cohere across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

徹底比較 (VS)

任意のAIモデルを切り替えて比較

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 4 Argon

高度な推論モデル

Google が提供する Gemini 4 Argon は、最大 1M トークンのコンテキストウィンドウを備え、入力 $2/100万トークン・出力 $10/100万トークンで利用可能な、コーディング・推論・業務自動化向け AI モデルです。

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Cohere

Aya Expanse 8B

オープンウェイトモデル

Cohere が提供する Aya Expanse 8B は、最大 8K トークンのコンテキストウィンドウを備え、入力 $0.08/100万トークン・出力 $0.16/100万トークンで利用可能な、コーディング・推論・業務自動化向け AI モデルです。

Intelligence Index36 / 100
Input Token:

$0.08 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.16 / 1M

Context Window:

8.2K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

24%

ひと目でわかる主な違い

  • Aya Expanse 8B is 41.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 8K tokens).
  • Aya Expanse 8B is faster at 135 tok/s vs 115 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 24.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 8B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9736
Provider
GoogleCohere
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.08 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$0.16 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$0.05 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
1000K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
115 tok/s135 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
81.9%24%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
81.5%40%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.02 / 1M

分野別勝者スコアカード

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+57.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Aya Expanse 8B
41.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Aya Expanse 8B
+17% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

検証済みベンチマークスコア比較

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 8B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

81.9%vs24%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

81.5%vs40%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

90.8%vs62%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1525ptsvs1205pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18.9%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

57.4%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

56.4%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

80.5%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

94.8%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

96.4%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

115 tok/s vs135 tok/s

レイテンシ&応答時間

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Aya Expanse 8B0.30s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s
Aya Expanse 8B4.00s

リアルタイムAPIトークン料金シミュレーター

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Aya Expanse 8B Monthly API Bill
$0.29 / month
$0.08/1M in · $0.16/1M out
Aya Expanse 8B saves approximately $11.86 / month (98%) under this workload.41.3x Savings

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Google の高度な Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts アーキテクチャと 1M トークンのコンテキスト処理能力
  • 優れたコストパフォーマンス(入力 $2/1M、出力 $10/1M)と安定した応答速度
  • プログラミング、論理的推論、多言語タスクにおいて高いベンチマーク精度を実現
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 大規模な長文コンテキスト処理時はトークン消費量の最適化が必要
  • 専門領域のタスクでは適切なプロンプト設計や RAG の併用が推奨される

Aya Expanse 8B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Cohere の高度な Compact Multilingual Dense Transformer アーキテクチャと 8K トークンのコンテキスト処理能力
  • 優れたコストパフォーマンス(入力 $0.08/1M、出力 $0.16/1M)と安定した応答速度
  • プログラミング、論理的推論、多言語タスクにおいて高いベンチマーク精度を実現
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 大規模な長文コンテキスト処理時はトークン消費量の最適化が必要
  • 専門領域のタスクでは適切なプロンプト設計や RAG の併用が推奨される

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 8B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.45$0.04
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
75K18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K0K

技術仕様・スペック

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 8B
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-4-argonaya-expanse-8b
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092024-10
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026August 2024
ArchitecturePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-ExpertsCompact Multilingual Dense Transformer
ParametersConfidential8B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFlat rate ($0.08/1M in) across full 8K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTLCached input at $0.02/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 4 Argon vs Aya Expanse 8B: よくある質問 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 4 Argon or Aya Expanse 8B?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 36 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Aya Expanse 8B is faster, generating 135 tokens per second compared with 115 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Aya Expanse 8B is cheaper at $0.05 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Aya Expanse 8B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.30s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.

総合評価

Choose Gemini 4 Argon for エンタープライズ自動化、ソフトウェア開発、ai エージェント構築、google エコシステムの統合, or choose Aya Expanse 8B for エンタープライズ自動化、ソフトウェア開発、ai エージェント構築、cohere エコシステムの統合.

よくある質問 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 4 Argon or Aya Expanse 8B?+

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while Aya Expanse 8B costs $0.08/1M input and $0.16/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 4 Argon or Aya Expanse 8B?+

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens whereas Aya Expanse 8B supports 8K tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

公的ソース: Google & Cohere Official Documentation