Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs DeepSeek Chat

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs DeepSeek Chat: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B dari Alibaba dan DeepSeek Chat dari DeepSeek adalah dua model AI unggulan. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B menawarkan jendela konteks 262.1K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan DeepSeek Chat menyediakan konteks 1M token seharga $0.28/$0.42 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

AI Multimodal Asli

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, menghadirkan jendela konteks 262K, kecepatan 125 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 77/100, serta akses

Intelligence Index77 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Chat

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

DeepSeek Chat dari DeepSeek adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 75 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 50/100, serta tarif $0.28/

Intelligence Index50 / 100
Input Token:

$0.28 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.42 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

54%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • DeepSeek Chat has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is faster at 125 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwen3.5 35B-A3BDeepSeek Chat
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7750
Provider
AlibabaDeepSeek
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.28 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.42 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.12 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
125 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A54%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
59%65%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.03 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
+67% faster generation
Context
DeepSeek Chat
1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3.5 35B-A3BDeepSeek Chat
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs54%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

59%vs65%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

76.5%vs79.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1305ptsvs1335pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs10.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs36%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs33.5%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs56.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs74%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs82.5%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

125 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B0.34s
DeepSeek Chat0.52s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B4.34s
DeepSeek Chat7.19s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
DeepSeek Chat Monthly API Bill
$0.84 / month
$0.28/1M in · $0.42/1M out
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B saves approximately $0.84 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 262K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (GPQA Diamond 59% · MMLU-Pro 76.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 125 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 340 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (35B total (3B MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

DeepSeek Chat · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 54% · GPQA Diamond 65%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 75 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 520 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (671B Total (37B )) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen3.5 35B-A3BDeepSeek Chat
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$0.15
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
14K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwen3.5 35B-A3BDeepSeek Chat
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen3-5-35b-a3b-instructdeepseek-chat
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-022025-12
Knowledge CutoffDecember 2025September 2025
ArchitectureLightweight Multimodal MoE TransformerMulti-Head Latent Attention (MLA) Sparse MoE
Parameters35B total (3B active MoE)671B Total (37B Active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Flat rate ($0.28/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix caching at $0.028/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 22 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 75 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 416 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1443 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs DeepSeek Chat: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or DeepSeek Chat?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is more intelligent. It scores 77 compared with 50 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is faster, generating 125 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.12 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.34s compared with 0.52s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek Chat has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Qwen3.5 35B-A3B (Sangat cocok untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun DeepSeek Chat (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B atau DeepSeek Chat?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs DeepSeek Chat?+

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan DeepSeek Chat sebesar $0.28 / $0.42. Secara keseluruhan, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B mendukung konteks 262.1K token dibandingkan 1M token pada DeepSeek Chat, sementara Qwen3.5 35B-A3B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Alibaba & DeepSeek serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).