Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Phi-4 Multimodal vs Command R7B Arabic

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Phi-4 Multimodal vs Command R7B Arabic: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Phi-4 Multimodal dari Microsoft dan Command R7B Arabic dari Cohere adalah dua model AI unggulan. Phi-4 Multimodal menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Command R7B Arabic menyediakan konteks 128K token seharga $0.07/$0.20 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Microsoft

Phi-4 Multimodal

AI Multimodal Asli

Phi-4 Multimodal dari Microsoft adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 160 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 75/100, serta ak

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Cohere

Command R7B Arabic

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Command R7B Arabic dari Cohere adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 135 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 39/100, serta tarif

Intelligence Index39 / 100
Input Token:

$0.07 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

26%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Phi-4 Multimodal is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Phi-4 Multimodal is faster at 160 tok/s vs 135 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeaturePhi-4 MultimodalCommand R7B Arabic
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7539
Provider
MicrosoftCohere
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.07 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.05 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
160 tok/s135 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A26%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
N/A43%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.02 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Phi-4 Multimodal
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Phi-4 Multimodal
+19% faster generation
Context
Tied
128K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Phi-4 MultimodalCommand R7B Arabic
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs26%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

N/Avs43%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

71%vs67%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1250ptsvs1225pts
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs70%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

160 tok/s vs135 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Phi-4 Multimodal0.23s
Command R7B Arabic0.31s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Phi-4 Multimodal3.35s
Command R7B Arabic4.01s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Phi-4 Multimodal Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Command R7B Arabic Monthly API Bill
$0.32 / month
$0.07/1M in · $0.2/1M out
Phi-4 Multimodal saves approximately $0.32 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Phi-4 Multimodal · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (MMLU-Pro 71% · Arena Elo 1250)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 160 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 230 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (5.6B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Command R7B Arabic · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 26% · GPQA Diamond 43%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 135 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 310 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (7B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricPhi-4 MultimodalCommand R7B Arabic
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$0.05
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
10K20K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeaturePhi-4 MultimodalCommand R7B Arabic
Official API Model ID (SDK)phi-4-multimodalcommand-r7b-arabic
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-022025-02
Knowledge CutoffNovember 2024December 2024
ArchitectureCompact Tri-Modal Foundation TransformerArabic-Specialized RAG Transformer
Parameters5.6B7B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Flat rate ($0.07/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Cached input at $0.02/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 3 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 12 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 4 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 15 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audiotext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Phi-4 Multimodal vs Command R7B Arabic: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Phi-4 Multimodal or Command R7B Arabic?

Phi-4 Multimodal is more intelligent. It scores 75 compared with 39 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Phi-4 Multimodal is faster, generating 160 tokens per second compared with 135 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Phi-4 Multimodal is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.05 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Phi-4 Multimodal has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.23s compared with 0.31s.

Kesimpulan

Baik Phi-4 Multimodal (Sangat cocok untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Command R7B Arabic (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Phi-4 Multimodal unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Phi-4 Multimodal memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Phi-4 Multimodal lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Phi-4 Multimodal atau Command R7B Arabic?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Phi-4 Multimodal memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Phi-4 Multimodal vs Command R7B Arabic?+

Phi-4 Multimodal mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Command R7B Arabic sebesar $0.07 / $0.20. Secara keseluruhan, Phi-4 Multimodal lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Phi-4 Multimodal mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 128K token pada Command R7B Arabic, sementara Phi-4 Multimodal unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Microsoft & Cohere serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).