Head-to-Head Model Comparison

o3-deep-research vs Gemini Deep Research

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

o3-deep-researchProfile

Gemini Deep ResearchProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

OpenAI

o3-deep-research

Mesin Penalaran Mendalam

o3-deep-research dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 200K, kecepatan 45 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 55/100, serta tarif $

Intelligence Index55 / 100

Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$40.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

55%

Google

Gemini Deep Research

Model Agen Otonom & Alat

Gemini Deep Research dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1.0M, kecepatan 60 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 91/

Intelligence Index91 / 100

Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$40.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
Gemini Deep Research has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
Gemini Deep Research is faster at 60 tok/s vs 45 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	o3-deep-research	Gemini Deep Research
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	55	91
Provider	OpenAI	Google
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$10.00 / 1M	$10.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$40.00 / 1M	$40.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$7.75 / 1M	$7.75 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text	1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	100K	66K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	45 tok/s	60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	55%	N/A
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	74.5%	85%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$2.50 / 1M	$2.50 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Speed

Gemini Deep Research

+33% faster generation

Context

Gemini Deep Research

1.05M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

o3-deep-researchGemini Deep Research

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

55%vsN/A

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

74.5%vs85%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

85.5%vs89.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1336ptsvs1495pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13.2%vs17.5%

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

41%vsN/A

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

43%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

87.5%vsN/A

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

82%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

45 tok/s vs60 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

o3-deep-research3.40s

Gemini Deep Research1.50s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

o3-deep-research14.51s

Gemini Deep Research9.83s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

o3-deep-research Monthly API Bill

$54.75 / month

$10/1M in · $40/1M out

Gemini Deep Research Monthly API Bill

$54.75 / month

$10/1M in · $40/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

o3-deep-research · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 200K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 100K token (SWE-bench Verified 55% · GPQA Diamond 74.5%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 45 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 3400 ms
Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $10/$40 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur

Considerations & Trade-offs

Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Gemini Deep Research · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 1.0M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (GPQA Diamond 85% · MMLU-Pro 89.5%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 60 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1500 ms
Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $10/$40 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur

Considerations & Trade-offs

Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	o3-deep-research	Gemini Deep Research
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$7.28	$8.50
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	90K	50K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	42K	35K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	o3-deep-research	Gemini Deep Research
Official API Model ID (SDK)	o3-deep-research	models/gemini-deep-research
API Protocol	OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1	Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date	2025-06	2026-04
Knowledge Cutoff	June 2024	Real-time Google Search Integration
Architecture	Agentic reasoning transformer with web and file tools	Agentic recursive research and synthesis engine
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM	10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 200K window	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix caching at $2.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)	Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $2.5/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG	Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)	Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published	Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

o3-deep-research vs Gemini Deep Research: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, o3-deep-research or Gemini Deep Research?

Gemini Deep Research is more intelligent. It scores 91 compared with 55 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini Deep Research is faster, generating 60 tokens per second compared with 45 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini Deep Research has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.50s compared with 3.40s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini Deep Research has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik o3-deep-research (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Gemini Deep Research (Sangat cocok untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Gemini Deep Research unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Gemini Deep Research memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan o3-deep-research lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, o3-deep-research atau Gemini Deep Research?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Gemini Deep Research memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API o3-deep-research vs Gemini Deep Research?+

o3-deep-research mengenakan biaya $10.00 / $40.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Gemini Deep Research sebesar $10.00 / $40.00. Secara keseluruhan, o3-deep-research lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

o3-deep-research mendukung konteks 200K token dibandingkan 1.05M token pada Gemini Deep Research, sementara Gemini Deep Research unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

o3-deep-research vs Gemini Deep Research

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

o3-deep-research

Gemini Deep Research

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

o3-deep-research · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Gemini Deep Research · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Spesifikasi Teknis

o3-deep-research vs Gemini Deep Research: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Kesimpulan

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Related reading