o1-mini vs Llama 5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare o1-mini by OpenAI against Llama 5 by Meta across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
o1-mini
Model Penalaran Mendalamo1-mini dari OpenAI adalah model AI canggih dengan jendela konteks 128K token serta harga API $1.1/1M token input dan $4.4/1M token output untuk pemrograman, penalaran, dan otomasi bisnis.
$1.10 / 1M
$4.40 / 1M
128K tokens
44%
Llama 5
Model Open-WeightsLlama 5 dari Meta adalah model AI canggih dengan jendela konteks 5M token serta harga API $0/1M token input dan $0/1M token output untuk pemrograman, penalaran, dan otomasi bisnis.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
5M tokens
74%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Llama 5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 128K tokens).
- o1-mini is faster at 90 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
- Llama 5 leads on SWE-bench coding (74.0% vs 44.0%).
| Feature | o1-mini | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 44 | 94 |
Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.10 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $4.40 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.05 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 66K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 90 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 44% | 74% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 68.5% | 84% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.55 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
o1-mini · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arsitektur Reasoning transformer with hidden chain-of-thought mutakhir dari OpenAI dengan dukungan konteks 128K token
- Efisiensi biaya API yang kompetitif ($1.1/1M input, $4.4/1M output) dan respons cepat
- Performa andal dalam pembuatan kode, analisis logika, serta pemahaman multibahasa
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Penggunaan konteks berukuran penuh memerlukan pengelolaan anggaran token yang cermat
- Membutuhkan perancangan prompt yang tepat untuk kasus penggunaan industri spesifik
Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arsitektur Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) mutakhir dari Meta dengan dukungan konteks 5M token
- Efisiensi biaya API yang kompetitif ($0/1M input, $0/1M output) dan respons cepat
- Performa andal dalam pembuatan kode, analisis logika, serta pemahaman multibahasa
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Penggunaan konteks berukuran penuh memerlukan pengelolaan anggaran token yang cermat
- Membutuhkan perancangan prompt yang tepat untuk kasus penggunaan industri spesifik
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | o1-mini | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.85 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 40K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 26K | 20K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | o1-mini | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | o1-mini | meta-llama/Llama-5 |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2024-09 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | October 2023 | January 2026 |
| Architecture | Reasoning transformer with hidden chain-of-thought | Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) |
| Parameters | Confidential | 600B+ total (~40-80B active) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($1.1/1M in) across full 128K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.55/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision, video, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
o1-mini vs Llama 5: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, o1-mini or Llama 5?
Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
o1-mini is faster, generating 90 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.05 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Llama 5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 2.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Choose o1-mini for otomasi perusahaan, pengembangan perangkat lunak, agen ai, dan alur kerja produksi berbasis openai, or choose Llama 5 for otomasi perusahaan, pengembangan perangkat lunak, agen ai, dan alur kerja produksi berbasis meta.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: o1-mini or Llama 5?+
o1-mini costs $1.1/1M input and $4.4/1M output tokens, while Llama 5 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: o1-mini or Llama 5?+
o1-mini supports 128K tokens whereas Llama 5 supports 5M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: OpenAI & Meta Official Documentation