Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL vs GPT-OSS 20B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL vs GPT-OSS 20B: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL dari NVIDIA dan GPT-OSS 20B dari OpenAI adalah dua model AI unggulan. Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $0.12/$0.30 per 1 juta token, sedangkan GPT-OSS 20B menyediakan konteks 131.1K token seharga $0.10/$0.50 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL

AI Multimodal Asli

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL dari NVIDIA adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 43/100, sert

Intelligence Index43 / 100
Input Token:

$0.12 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

31%

OpenAI

GPT-OSS 20B

Penalaran Bobot Terbuka

GPT-OSS 20B dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, menghadirkan jendela konteks 131K, kecepatan 160 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 46/100, serta t

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.5%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL is 1.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-OSS 20B has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
  • GPT-OSS 20B is faster at 160 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • GPT-OSS 20B leads on SWE-bench coding (32.5% vs 31.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron Nano 12B v2 VLGPT-OSS 20B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4346
Provider
NVIDIAOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.12 / 1M$0.10 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.30 / 1M$0.50 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.07 / 1M$0.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K33K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
110 tok/s160 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
31%32.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
47%55%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.03 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-OSS 20B
+1.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
1.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-OSS 20B
+45% faster generation
Context
GPT-OSS 20B
131.1K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VLGPT-OSS 20B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

31%vs32.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

47%vs55%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

70%vs72.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1250ptsvs1288pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs7.2%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

27%vs22%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs24.5%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs46%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

52%vs72%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

66%vs63%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

110 tok/s vs160 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL0.35s
GPT-OSS 20B0.26s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL4.90s
GPT-OSS 20B3.38s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL Monthly API Bill
$0.49 / month
$0.12/1M in · $0.3/1M out
GPT-OSS 20B Monthly API Bill
$0.61 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.5/1M out
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL saves approximately $0.12 / month (20%) under this workload.1.2x Savings

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 31% · GPQA Diamond 47%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 350 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (12B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

GPT-OSS 20B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 131K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 33K token (SWE-bench Verified 32.5% · GPQA Diamond 55%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 160 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 260 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (21B (3.6B MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron Nano 12B v2 VLGPT-OSS 20B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.09$0.09
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K40K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
8K18K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron Nano 12B v2 VLGPT-OSS 20B
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-nano-12b-v2-vlgpt-oss-20b
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-102025-08
Knowledge CutoffAugust 2025June 2024
ArchitectureCompact Vision-Language TransformerSparse MoE transformer with reasoning
Parameters12B21B (3.6B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.12/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 131K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.03/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 7 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 26 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 13 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 45 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL vs GPT-OSS 20B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL or GPT-OSS 20B?

GPT-OSS 20B is more intelligent. It scores 46 compared with 43 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-OSS 20B is faster, generating 160 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-OSS 20B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.26s compared with 0.35s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-OSS 20B has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Sangat cocok untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun GPT-OSS 20B (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: GPT-OSS 20B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, GPT-OSS 20B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL atau GPT-OSS 20B?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, GPT-OSS 20B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL vs GPT-OSS 20B?+

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL mengenakan biaya $0.12 / $0.30 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan GPT-OSS 20B sebesar $0.10 / $0.50. Secara keseluruhan, Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 131.1K token pada GPT-OSS 20B, sementara GPT-OSS 20B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi NVIDIA & OpenAI serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).