Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B dari NVIDIA dan Qwen3.8 Max Preview dari Alibaba adalah dua model AI unggulan. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B menawarkan jendela konteks 1M token dengan harga $1.00/$3.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Qwen3.8 Max Preview menyediakan konteks 1M token seharga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B dari NVIDIA adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 65 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 60/100, serta t

Intelligence Index60 / 100
Input Token:

$1.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

64.5%

Alibaba

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Qwen3.8 Max Preview dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 60 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 93/100, serta akses g

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75.2%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is faster at 65 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview leads on SWE-bench coding (75.2% vs 64.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BQwen3.8 Max Preview
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6093
Provider
NVIDIAAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$3.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.68 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K32K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
65 tok/s60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
64.5%75.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
76%79.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
+10.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
+8% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BQwen3.8 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

64.5%vs75.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

76%vs79.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

87.5%vs89%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1425ptsvs1485pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

53%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs77%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

86%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

89%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs60 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B0.62s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview0.68s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B8.31s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview9.01s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B Monthly API Bill
$4.58 / month
$1/1M in · $3/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview saves approximately $4.58 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 64.5% · GPQA Diamond 76%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 65 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 620 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (550B (55B MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 32K token (SWE-bench Verified 75.2% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 60 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 680 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (2.4T total (95B MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BQwen3.8 Max Preview
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.85$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
48K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
24K15K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BQwen3.8 Max Preview
Official API Model ID (SDK)nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55bqwen3-8-max-preview-instruct
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-062026-07
Knowledge CutoffFebruary 2026April 2026
ArchitectureColossal Sparse MoE (550B Total / 55B Active)Colossus-Scale Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters550B (55B active MoE)2.4T total (95B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1/1M in) across full 1000K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.25/1M tokensAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 341 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1183 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1488 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 5160 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 60 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.68 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.62s compared with 0.68s.

Kesimpulan

Baik Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Qwen3.8 Max Preview (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Qwen3.8 Max Preview unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Qwen3.8 Max Preview lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B atau Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Qwen3.8 Max Preview memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B mengenakan biaya $1.00 / $3.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Qwen3.8 Max Preview sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, Qwen3.8 Max Preview lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B mendukung konteks 1M token dibandingkan 1M token pada Qwen3.8 Max Preview, sementara Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi NVIDIA & Alibaba serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).