Llama 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Llama 5 dari Meta dan Qwen3.8 Max Preview dari Alibaba adalah dua model AI unggulan. Llama 5 menawarkan jendela konteks 5M token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Qwen3.8 Max Preview menyediakan konteks 1M token seharga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Llama 5
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaLlama 5 dari Meta adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 5M, kecepatan 65 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 94/100, serta akses gratis open-weig
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
5M tokens
74%
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaQwen3.8 Max Preview dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 60 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 93/100, serta akses g
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
1M tokens
75.2%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 1M tokens).
- Llama 5 is faster at 65 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview leads on SWE-bench coding (75.2% vs 74.0%).
| Feature | Llama 5 | Qwen3.8 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 94 | 93 |
Provider | Meta | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 128K | 32K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 65 tok/s | 60 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 74% | 75.2% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 84% | 79.5% |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 5M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 74% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 65 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 850 ms
- Bobot terbuka (600B+ total (~40-80B )) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 32K token (SWE-bench Verified 75.2% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 60 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 680 ms
- Bobot terbuka (2.4T total (95B MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Llama 5 | Qwen3.8 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 40K | 35K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 20K | 15K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Llama 5 | Qwen3.8 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | meta-llama/Llama-5 | qwen3-8-max-preview-instruct |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-07 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2026 | April 2026 |
| Architecture | Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) | Colossus-Scale Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | 600B+ total (~40-80B active) | 2.4T total (95B active MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1488 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 5160 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, video, audio | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Llama 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Llama 5 or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?
Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Llama 5 is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.68s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 1M tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Llama 5 (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Qwen3.8 Max Preview (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Llama 5 unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Llama 5 memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Llama 5 lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Llama 5 atau Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Llama 5 memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Llama 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+
Llama 5 mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Qwen3.8 Max Preview sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, Llama 5 lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Llama 5 mendukung konteks 5M token dibandingkan 1M token pada Qwen3.8 Max Preview, sementara Llama 5 unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 5: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- GPT-OSS 120B vs Llama 5: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Llama 4 Behemoth vs Llama 5: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Llama 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Llama 5 vs GPT-6 Astra: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Llama 5 vs Kimi K3: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Meta & Alibaba serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).