Nemotron 3 Content Safety vs Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Nemotron 3 Content Safety dari NVIDIA dan Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B dari NVIDIA adalah dua model AI unggulan. Nemotron 3 Content Safety menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $0.05/$0.10 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B menyediakan konteks 128K token seharga $0.05/$0.15 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Nemotron 3 Content Safety
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaNemotron 3 Content Safety dari NVIDIA adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 190 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 37/100, serta
$0.05 / 1M
$0.10 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B
Penalaran Bobot TerbukaNemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B dari NVIDIA adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 150 token/detik, indeks k
$0.05 / 1M
$0.15 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Nemotron 3 Content Safety is 1.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Nemotron 3 Content Safety is faster at 190 tok/s vs 150 tok/s.
| Feature | Nemotron 3 Content Safety | Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 37 | 38 |
Provider | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.05 / 1M | $0.05 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.10 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.03 / 1M | $0.03 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 2K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 190 tok/s | 150 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.01 / 1M | $0.01 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Nemotron 3 Content Safety · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 2K token (Arena Elo 1175)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 190 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 160 ms
- Bobot terbuka (8B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (Arena Elo 1190)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 150 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 240 ms
- Bobot terbuka (4B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Content Safety | Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.01 | $0.02 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 2K | 4K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 2K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Nemotron 3 Content Safety | Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | nemotron-3-content-safety | nemotron-content-safety-reasoning-4b |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-01 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | November 2025 |
| Architecture | Enterprise Safety Classifier Transformer | Reasoning-Augmented Safety Classifier |
| Parameters | 8B | 4B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.05/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($0.05/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.01/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.01/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Text-only completion (No GUI action loop) | Text-only completion (No GUI action loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Prompt-based JSON extraction only | Prompt-based JSON extraction only |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 9 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Nemotron 3 Content Safety vs Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Nemotron 3 Content Safety or Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B?
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B is more intelligent. It scores 38 compared with 37 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Nemotron 3 Content Safety is faster, generating 190 tokens per second compared with 150 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Nemotron 3 Content Safety has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.16s compared with 0.24s.
Kesimpulan
Baik Nemotron 3 Content Safety (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Nemotron 3 Content Safety memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Nemotron 3 Content Safety lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Nemotron 3 Content Safety atau Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Nemotron 3 Content Safety vs Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B?+
Nemotron 3 Content Safety mengenakan biaya $0.05 / $0.10 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B sebesar $0.05 / $0.15. Secara keseluruhan, Nemotron 3 Content Safety lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Nemotron 3 Content Safety mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 128K token pada Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B, sementara Nemotron 3 Content Safety unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Nemotron 3 Content Safety: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Nemotron 3 Content Safety vs GPT OSS Safeguard 120B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B vs GPT OSS Safeguard 120B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi NVIDIA & NVIDIA serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).