Hy3 vs Hy3 preview
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Hy3 dari Tencent dan Hy3 preview dari Tencent adalah dua model AI unggulan. Hy3 menawarkan jendela konteks 262.1K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Hy3 preview menyediakan konteks 262.1K token seharga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Hy3
Penalaran Bobot TerbukaHy3 dari Tencent adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, menghadirkan jendela konteks 262K, kecepatan 85 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 81/100, serta akses gra
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
262.1K tokens
N/A
Hy3 preview
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaHy3 preview dari Tencent adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 262K, kecepatan 88 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 79/100, serta akses gratis
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
262.1K tokens
N/A
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Hy3 preview is faster at 88 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
| Feature | Hy3 | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 81 | 79 |
Provider | Tencent | Tencent |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text | 262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 88 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 64% | N/A |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Hy3 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 262K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (GPQA Diamond 64% · MMLU-Pro 79%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 85 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 460 ms
- Bobot terbuka (Confidential / 140B MoE) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Hy3 preview · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 262K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (MMLU-Pro 76.5% · Arena Elo 1310)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 88 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 440 ms
- Bobot terbuka (Confidential / 140B MoE) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Hy3 | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 18K | 15K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 5K | 3K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Hy3 | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | hy3 | hy3-preview |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-07 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | April 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Efficient Open Reasoning MoE Transformer | Preview Open Reasoning MoE Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential / 140B MoE | Confidential / 140B MoE |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 301 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 87 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 301 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Hy3 vs Hy3 preview: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Hy3 or Hy3 preview?
Hy3 is more intelligent. It scores 81 compared with 79 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Hy3 preview is faster, generating 88 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Hy3 preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.44s compared with 0.46s.
Kesimpulan
Baik Hy3 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran rantai pemikiran (Chain-of-Thought) berbobot terbuka yang sangat efisien, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Hy3 preview (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Hy3 unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Hy3 preview memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Hy3 lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Hy3 atau Hy3 preview?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Hy3 memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Hy3 vs Hy3 preview?+
Hy3 mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Hy3 preview sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, Hy3 lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Hy3 mendukung konteks 262.1K token dibandingkan 262.1K token pada Hy3 preview, sementara Hy3 preview unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemma 4 E4B vs Hy3 preview: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Hy3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Tencent & Tencent serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).