Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) dari xAI dan GPT-4.1 dari OpenAI adalah dua model AI unggulan. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) menawarkan jendela konteks 1M token dengan harga $3.00/$15.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan GPT-4.1 menyediakan konteks 1.05M token seharga $2.00/$8.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
xAI

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

Model Agen Otonom & Alat

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) dari xAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 135 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 62

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

61.5%

OpenAI

GPT-4.1

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

GPT-4.1 dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1.0M, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 48/100, serta tarif $2/$

Intelligence Index48 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$8.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

54.6%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • GPT-4.1 is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-4.1 has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is faster at 135 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads on SWE-bench coding (61.5% vs 54.6%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6248
Provider
xAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$3.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$15.00 / 1M$8.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$2.63 / 1M$1.55 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1.05M tokens~1,571 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K33K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
135 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
61.5%54.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
65.4%65%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.75 / 1M$0.50 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
+6.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-4.1
1.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
+23% faster generation
Context
GPT-4.1
1.05M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

61.5%vs54.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

65.4%vs65%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

81.2%vs81%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1360ptsvs1338pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

9.4%vs9.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

39.8%vs30%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

36.5%vs36.5%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

60.2%vs58.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

76.5%vs55.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

85%vs70%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

135 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)0.42s
GPT-4.10.48s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)4.12s
GPT-4.15.03s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) Monthly API Bill
$19.13 / month
$3/1M in · $15/1M out
GPT-4.1 Monthly API Bill
$10.95 / month
$2/1M in · $8/1M out
GPT-4.1 saves approximately $8.18 / month (43%) under this workload.1.7x Savings

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 61.5% · GPQA Diamond 65.4%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 135 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 420 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $3/$15 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

GPT-4.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1.0M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 33K token (SWE-bench Verified 54.6% · GPQA Diamond 65%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 480 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2/$8 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.88$0.72
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K52K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
Official API Model ID (SDK)grok-4-20-non-reasoning-latestgpt-4-1
API ProtocolxAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-032025-04
Knowledge CutoffNovember 2025June 2024
ArchitectureColossus-Scale Sparse MoEDense multimodal transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 1000K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1048K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.75/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $0.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code ExecutionNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationxAI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or GPT-4.1?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is more intelligent. It scores 62 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is faster, generating 135 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-4.1 is cheaper at $1.55 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.63 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.42s compared with 0.48s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-4.1 has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Kesimpulan

Baik Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (Sangat cocok untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun GPT-4.1 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan GPT-4.1 lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) atau GPT-4.1?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1?+

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) mengenakan biaya $3.00 / $15.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan GPT-4.1 sebesar $2.00 / $8.00. Secara keseluruhan, GPT-4.1 lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) mendukung konteks 1M token dibandingkan 1.05M token pada GPT-4.1, sementara Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi xAI & OpenAI serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).