Granite 3.3 8B vs Qwen3 32B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Granite 3.3 8B dari IBM dan Qwen3 32B dari Alibaba adalah dua model AI unggulan. Granite 3.3 8B menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Qwen3 32B menyediakan konteks 131.1K token seharga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Granite 3.3 8B
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaGranite 3.3 8B dari IBM adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 140 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 74/100, serta akses gratis
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
Qwen3 32B
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaQwen3 32B dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 131K, kecepatan 85 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 78/100, serta akses gratis op
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
40%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Qwen3 32B has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
- Granite 3.3 8B is faster at 140 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
| Feature | Granite 3.3 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 74 | 78 |
Provider | IBM | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 140 tok/s | 85 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 40% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 59% |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Granite 3.3 8B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (MMLU-Pro 69.5% · Arena Elo 1235)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 140 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 280 ms
- Bobot terbuka (8B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Qwen3 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 131K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 40% · GPQA Diamond 59%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 85 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 440 ms
- Bobot terbuka (32B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Granite 3.3 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 12K | 16K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 2K | 4K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Granite 3.3 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | granite-3-3-8b | qwen3-32b-instruct |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-04 | 2025-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2025 | February 2025 |
| Architecture | Enterprise-Calibrated Open Transformer | Dense Autoregressive Transformer |
| Parameters | 8B | 32B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 5 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 17 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Granite 3.3 8B vs Qwen3 32B: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Granite 3.3 8B or Qwen3 32B?
Qwen3 32B is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 74 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Granite 3.3 8B is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Granite 3.3 8B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.28s compared with 0.44s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen3 32B has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Granite 3.3 8B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Qwen3 32B (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Qwen3 32B unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Granite 3.3 8B memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Granite 3.3 8B lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Granite 3.3 8B atau Qwen3 32B?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Qwen3 32B memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Granite 3.3 8B vs Qwen3 32B?+
Granite 3.3 8B mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Qwen3 32B sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, Granite 3.3 8B lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Granite 3.3 8B mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 131.1K token pada Qwen3 32B, sementara Granite 3.3 8B unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Granite 3.3 8B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 235B-A22B: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi IBM & Alibaba serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).