GPT-4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare GPT-4.5 by OpenAI against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
GPT-4.5
Mesin Penalaran MendalamGPT-4.5 dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 45 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 46/100, serta tarif $75/$150 p
$75.00 / 1M
$150.00 / 1M
128K tokens
42%
GPT-6 Astra
Model Suara & Audio AsliGPT-6 Astra dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk sintesis suara alami, pemrosesan audio real-time, dan transkripsi ucapan, menghadirkan jendela konteks 272K, kecepatan 100 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 96/100, serta tarif $10/$
$10.00 / 1M
$50.00 / 1M
272K tokens
82.4%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- GPT-6 Astra is 4.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 128K tokens).
- GPT-6 Astra is faster at 100 tok/s vs 45 tok/s.
- GPT-6 Astra leads on SWE-bench coding (82.4% vs 42.0%).
| Feature | GPT-4.5 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 46 | 96 |
Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $75.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $150.00 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $43.13 / 1M | $7.70 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 45 tok/s | 100 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 42% | 82.4% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 66.5% | 80.9% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $18.75 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT-4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 42% · GPQA Diamond 66.5%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 45 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1600 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $75/$150 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya
GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 272K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 82.4% · GPQA Diamond 80.9%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 100 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 950 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $10/$50 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT-4.5 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $17.85 | $2.15 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 55K | 58K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 32K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GPT-4.5 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-4-5 | gpt-6-astra |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2025-02 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | October 2023 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Large dense pre-reasoning transformer | Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($75/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $18.75/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text, audio |
GPT-4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, GPT-4.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-6 Astra is faster, generating 100 tokens per second compared with 45 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GPT-6 Astra is cheaper at $7.70 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $43.13 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
GPT-6 Astra has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.95s compared with 1.60s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Choose GPT-4.5 for sangat cocok untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi., or choose GPT-6 Astra for sangat cocok untuk sintesis suara alami, pemrosesan audio real-time, dan transkripsi ucapan, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi..
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: GPT-4.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+
GPT-4.5 costs $75/1M input and $150/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT-4.5 or GPT-6 Astra?+
GPT-4.5 supports 128K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: OpenAI & OpenAI Official Documentation