GLM-5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare GLM-5 by Zhipu AI against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
GLM-5
Model Open-WeightsGLM-5 dari Zhipu AI adalah model AI canggih dengan jendela konteks 204K token serta harga API $0/1M token input dan $0/1M token output untuk pemrograman, penalaran, dan otomasi bisnis.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
204.8K tokens
58%
Gemini 4 Argon
Model Penalaran MendalamGemini 4 Argon dari Google adalah model AI canggih dengan jendela konteks 1M token serta harga API $2/1M token input dan $10/1M token output untuk pemrograman, penalaran, dan otomasi bisnis.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- GLM-5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 205K tokens).
- Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 68 tok/s.
- Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 58.0%).
| Feature | GLM-5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 87 | 97 |
Provider | Zhipu AI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 204.8K tokens~307 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 68 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 58% | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 68% | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GLM-5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arsitektur Frontier Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Autoregressive Transformer mutakhir dari Zhipu AI dengan dukungan konteks 204K token
- Efisiensi biaya API yang kompetitif ($0/1M input, $0/1M output) dan respons cepat
- Performa andal dalam pembuatan kode, analisis logika, serta pemahaman multibahasa
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Penggunaan konteks berukuran penuh memerlukan pengelolaan anggaran token yang cermat
- Membutuhkan perancangan prompt yang tepat untuk kasus penggunaan industri spesifik
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Arsitektur Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts mutakhir dari Google dengan dukungan konteks 1M token
- Efisiensi biaya API yang kompetitif ($2/1M input, $10/1M output) dan respons cepat
- Performa andal dalam pembuatan kode, analisis logika, serta pemahaman multibahasa
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Penggunaan konteks berukuran penuh memerlukan pengelolaan anggaran token yang cermat
- Membutuhkan perancangan prompt yang tepat untuk kasus penggunaan industri spesifik
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GLM-5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 8K | 36K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GLM-5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | glm-5 | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-02 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | December 2025 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Frontier Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Autoregressive Transformer | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | 240B MoE | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 149 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 516 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GLM-5 vs Gemini 4 Argon: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, GLM-5 or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 87 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 68 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GLM-5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
GLM-5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.58s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 204.8K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Choose GLM-5 for otomasi perusahaan, pengembangan perangkat lunak, agen ai, dan alur kerja produksi berbasis zhipu ai, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for otomasi perusahaan, pengembangan perangkat lunak, agen ai, dan alur kerja produksi berbasis google.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: GLM-5 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
GLM-5 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: GLM-5 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
GLM-5 supports 205K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonBandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Zhipu AI & Google Official Documentation