Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini Deep Research vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (4)
GoogleGoogleflagshipflagship

Compare Gemini Deep Research by Google against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini Deep Research

Model Agen Otonom & Alat

Gemini Deep Research dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1.0M, kecepatan 60 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 91/

Intelligence Index91 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$40.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

AI Multimodal Asli

Gemini 4 Argon dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 115 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 97/100, serta tarif $2/

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Gemini 4 Argon is 4.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini Deep Research has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini Deep ResearchGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9197
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$10.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$40.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$7.75 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
60 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
85%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$2.50 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Gemini 4 Argon
4.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+92% faster generation
Context
Gemini Deep Research
1.05M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini Deep ResearchGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

85%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.5%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1495ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

17.5%vs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

60 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini Deep Research1.50s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini Deep Research9.83s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini Deep Research Monthly API Bill
$54.75 / month
$10/1M in · $40/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon saves approximately $42.60 / month (78%) under this workload.4.5x Savings

Gemini Deep Research · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1.0M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (GPQA Diamond 85% · MMLU-Pro 89.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 60 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1500 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $10/$40 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 1M token (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 115 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 850 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2/$10 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini Deep ResearchGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$8.50$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
50K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
35K36K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini Deep ResearchGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-deep-researchmodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-042026-09
Knowledge CutoffReal-time Google Search IntegrationJune 2026
ArchitectureAgentic recursive research and synthesis enginePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $2.5/1M with configurable TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini Deep Research vs Gemini 4 Argon: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini Deep Research or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 91 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.75 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 4 Argon has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 1.50s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini Deep Research has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Kesimpulan

Choose Gemini Deep Research for sangat cocok untuk alur kerja agen otonom, pemanggilan alat (tool calling), dan otomatisasi multi-langkah, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for sangat cocok untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi..

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini Deep Research or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Gemini Deep Research costs $10/1M input and $40/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini Deep Research or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Gemini Deep Research supports 1.0M tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Google & Google Official Documentation