Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Gemini 2.0 Pro dari Google dan Claude 3.7 Sonnet dari Anthropic adalah dua model AI unggulan. Gemini 2.0 Pro menawarkan jendela konteks 2M token dengan harga $1.25/$5.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Claude 3.7 Sonnet menyediakan konteks 200K token seharga $3.00/$15.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Gemini 2.0 Pro
Model Unggulan Garis DepanGemini 2.0 Pro dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 2M, kecepatan 95 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 52/100, serta tarif
$1.25 / 1M
$5.00 / 1M
2M tokens
63.8%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Pemimpin Pemrograman & KodeClaude 3.7 Sonnet dari Anthropic adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk rekayasa perangkat lunak otonom, refactoring multi-file, dan debugging mendalam, menghadirkan jendela konteks 200K, kecepatan 72 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 48/100, se
$3.00 / 1M
$15.00 / 1M
200K tokens
70.3%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Gemini 2.0 Pro is 2.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 2.0 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 200K tokens).
- Gemini 2.0 Pro is faster at 95 tok/s vs 72 tok/s.
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads on SWE-bench coding (70.3% vs 63.8%).
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 52 | 48 |
Provider | Anthropic | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.25 / 1M | $3.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $5.00 / 1M | $15.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.97 / 1M | $2.31 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 64K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 95 tok/s | 72 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 63.8% | 70.3% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 71.5% | 65% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.31 / 1M | $0.30 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini 2.0 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 2M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 63.8% · GPQA Diamond 71.5%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 95 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 620 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $1.25/$5 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Claude 3.7 Sonnet · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 200K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 64K token (SWE-bench Verified 70.3% · GPQA Diamond 65%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 72 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 520 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $3/$15 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.59 | $1.42 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 60K | 41K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 33K | 22K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-2-pro | claude-3-7-sonnet-20250201 |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI |
| Release Date | 2025-02 | 2025-02 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2025 | November 2024 |
| Architecture | Multimodal Deep Reasoning Sparse MoE | Hybrid Reasoning MoE |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTL | $0.3/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini 2.0 Pro or Claude 3.7 Sonnet?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is more intelligent. It scores 52 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 72 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.97 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.31 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.52s compared with 0.62s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 200K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Gemini 2.0 Pro (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Sangat cocok untuk rekayasa perangkat lunak otonom, refactoring multi-file, dan debugging mendalam, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Gemini 2.0 Pro unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Gemini 2.0 Pro memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Gemini 2.0 Pro lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Gemini 2.0 Pro atau Claude 3.7 Sonnet?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Gemini 2.0 Pro memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet?+
Gemini 2.0 Pro mengenakan biaya $1.25 / $5.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Claude 3.7 Sonnet sebesar $3.00 / $15.00. Secara keseluruhan, Gemini 2.0 Pro lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Gemini 2.0 Pro mendukung konteks 2M token dibandingkan 200K token pada Claude 3.7 Sonnet, sementara Gemini 2.0 Pro unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o3-mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Google & Anthropic serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).