Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Mesin Penalaran MendalamGemini 2.5 Pro dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1.0M, kecepatan 95 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 78/100, serta tarif $1.
$1.25 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1.05M tokens
63.8%
GPT-6.1 Sol
Model Unggulan Garis DepanGPT-6.1 Sol dari OpenAI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 120 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 94/100, serta tarif $2
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
82.3%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
- GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
- GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 63.8%).
| Feature | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 78 | 94 |
Provider | OpenAI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.25 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $10.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.47 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 66K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 95 tok/s | 120 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 63.8% | 82.3% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 84% | 80.8% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.31 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini 2.5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 1.0M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 63.8% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 95 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 820 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $1.25/$10 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 82.3% · GPQA Diamond 80.8%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 120 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1120 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2/$10 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.45 | $2.05 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 62K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 22K | 36K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-2-5-pro | gpt-6-1-sol |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2025-03 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | January 2025 | April 2026 |
| Architecture | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with Thinking | Near-Astra unified reasoning model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol?
GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 78 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 95 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.82s compared with 1.12s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.
Kesimpulan
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro for sangat cocok untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi., or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi ai, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi..
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol?+
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Google & OpenAI Official Documentation