Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Fugu UltraProfile

Claude Fable 5Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Sakana AI

Fugu Ultra

Mesin Penalaran Mendalam

Fugu Ultra dari Sakana AI adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 75 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 86/100, serta tarif $1.5/$

Intelligence Index86 / 100

Input Token:

$1.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

Claude Fable 5 dari Anthropic adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 52 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 72/100, serta tar

Intelligence Index72 / 100

Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.5%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

Fugu Ultra is 7.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Fugu Ultra is faster at 75 tok/s vs 52 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Fugu Ultra	Claude Fable 5
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	86	72
Provider	Sakana AI	Anthropic
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$1.50 / 1M	$10.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$6.00 / 1M	$50.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$1.01 / 1M	$7.70 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	16K	128K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	75 tok/s	52 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	N/A	76.5%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	67%	79.2%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.15 / 1M	$1.00 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Fugu Ultra

7.8x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Fugu Ultra

+44% faster generation

Context

Tied

1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Fugu UltraClaude Fable 5

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs76.5%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

67%vs79.2%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83%vs88.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1370ptsvs1435pts

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs44.5%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

75 tok/s vs52 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Fugu Ultra0.54s

Claude Fable 51.75s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Fugu Ultra7.21s

Claude Fable 511.37s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Fugu Ultra Monthly API Bill

$7.88 / month

$1.5/1M in · $6/1M out

Claude Fable 5 Monthly API Bill

$61.50 / month

$10/1M in · $50/1M out

Fugu Ultra saves approximately $53.63 / month (87%) under this workload.7.8x Savings

Fugu Ultra · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (GPQA Diamond 67% · MMLU-Pro 83%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 75 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 540 ms
Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $1.5/$6 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur

Considerations & Trade-offs

Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Claude Fable 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 76.5% · GPQA Diamond 79.2%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 52 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1750 ms
Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $10/$50 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur

Considerations & Trade-offs

Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Fugu Ultra	Claude Fable 5
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.28	$10.97
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	22K	72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	8K	37K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Fugu Ultra	Claude Fable 5
Official API Model ID (SDK)	fugu-ultra	claude-fable-5-20260601
API Protocol	Sakana AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date	2026-06	2026-06
Knowledge Cutoff	March 2026	March 2026
Architecture	Evolutionary Multi-Model Merged Transformer	Mythos-Class Dense Reasoning Architecture
Parameters	Confidential / Frontier Merged	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 1000K window	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.15/1M tokens	$1/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning Support	API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Sakana AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Fugu Ultra or Claude Fable 5?

Fugu Ultra is more intelligent. It scores 86 compared with 72 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Fugu Ultra is faster, generating 75 tokens per second compared with 52 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Fugu Ultra is cheaper at $1.01 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Fugu Ultra has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.54s compared with 1.75s.

Kesimpulan

Baik Fugu Ultra (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Claude Fable 5 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Fugu Ultra unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Fugu Ultra memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Fugu Ultra lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Fugu Ultra atau Claude Fable 5?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Fugu Ultra memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5?+

Fugu Ultra mengenakan biaya $1.50 / $6.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Claude Fable 5 sebesar $10.00 / $50.00. Secara keseluruhan, Fugu Ultra lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Fugu Ultra mendukung konteks 1M token dibandingkan 1M token pada Claude Fable 5, sementara Fugu Ultra unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Fugu Ultra

Claude Fable 5

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Fugu Ultra · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Claude Fable 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Spesifikasi Teknis

Fugu Ultra vs Claude Fable 5: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Kesimpulan

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Related reading