Doubao Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Doubao Pro dari ByteDance dan Qwen3.6 Plus dari Alibaba adalah dua model AI unggulan. Doubao Pro menawarkan jendela konteks 256K token dengan harga $0.80/$3.20 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Qwen3.6 Plus menyediakan konteks 1M token seharga $0.70/$2.80 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Doubao Pro
Model Unggulan Garis DepanDoubao Pro dari ByteDance adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 256K, kecepatan 85 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 88/100, serta tarif
$0.80 / 1M
$3.20 / 1M
256K tokens
58%
Qwen3.6 Plus
AI Multimodal AsliQwen3.6 Plus dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 90 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 88/100, serta tarif $0.7/
$0.70 / 1M
$2.80 / 1M
1M tokens
66.5%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Qwen3.6 Plus is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen3.6 Plus has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
- Qwen3.6 Plus is faster at 90 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
- Qwen3.6 Plus leads on SWE-bench coding (66.5% vs 58.0%).
| Feature | Doubao Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 88 | 88 |
Provider | ByteDance | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.80 / 1M | $0.70 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $3.20 / 1M | $2.80 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.54 / 1M | $0.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 90 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 58% | 66.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 71.5% | 73.8% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.08 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkSkor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Doubao Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 256K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 58% · GPQA Diamond 71.5%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 85 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 460 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $0.8/$3.2 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Qwen3.6 Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 66.5% · GPQA Diamond 73.8%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 90 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 460 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $0.7/$2.8 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Doubao Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.25 | $0.21 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 25K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 8K | 9K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Doubao Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | doubao-pro | qwen3-6-plus-instruct |
| API Protocol | ByteDance REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Alibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Advanced Creative Omnimodal MoE Transformer | High-Throughput Multimodal Foundation Transformer |
| Parameters | 300B (MoE) | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.8/1M in) across full 256K window | Flat rate ($0.7/1M in) across full 1000K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.08/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.07/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | ByteDance Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Alibaba Production Safety & Alignment Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Doubao Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which model is faster?
Qwen3.6 Plus is faster, generating 90 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper at $0.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.54 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen3.6 Plus has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 256K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Doubao Pro (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Qwen3.6 Plus (Sangat cocok untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Doubao Pro unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Qwen3.6 Plus memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Qwen3.6 Plus lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Doubao Pro atau Qwen3.6 Plus?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Doubao Pro memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Doubao Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus?+
Doubao Pro mengenakan biaya $0.80 / $3.20 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Qwen3.6 Plus sebesar $0.70 / $2.80. Secara keseluruhan, Qwen3.6 Plus lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Doubao Pro mendukung konteks 256K token dibandingkan 1M token pada Qwen3.6 Plus, sementara Qwen3.6 Plus unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Doubao Pro vs Doubao Global: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.6 Plus: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Qwen3.6 Plus vs Qwen3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi ByteDance & Alibaba serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).