Doubao Global vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Doubao Global dari ByteDance dan Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 dari Google adalah dua model AI unggulan. Doubao Global menawarkan jendela konteks 256K token dengan harga $0.15/$0.45 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 menyediakan konteks 131.1K token seharga $2.50/$10.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Doubao Global
Model Multibahasa GlobalDoubao Global dari ByteDance adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penerjemahan multibahasa yang akurat dan komunikasi perusahaan global, menghadirkan jendela konteks 256K, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 83/100, serta tarif $0.
$0.15 / 1M
$0.45 / 1M
256K tokens
N/A
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
Mesin Penalaran MendalamGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 131K, kecepatan 90 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 82/100, serta t
$2.50 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Doubao Global is 20.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Doubao Global has a larger context window (256K vs 131K tokens).
- Doubao Global is faster at 110 tok/s vs 90 tok/s.
| Feature | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 83 | 82 |
Provider | ByteDance | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.15 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.45 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.09 / 1M | $1.85 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 110 tok/s | 90 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 65% | N/A |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.01 / 1M | $0.50 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Doubao Global · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 256K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (GPQA Diamond 65% · MMLU-Pro 80%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 360 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $0.15/$0.45 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 131K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (Arena Elo 1410)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 90 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 700 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $2.5/$10 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.07 | $1.80 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 18K | 12K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 4K | 6K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | doubao-global | models/gemini-robotics-er-1-6 |
| API Protocol | ByteDance REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Globally Optimized Multimodal Transformer | Embodied Spatial Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.15/1M in) across full 256K window | Flat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 131K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.015/1M tokens | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.5/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | ByteDance Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Doubao Global vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Doubao Global or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?
Doubao Global is more intelligent. It scores 83 compared with 82 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Doubao Global is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 90 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Doubao Global is cheaper at $0.09 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Doubao Global has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.36s compared with 0.70s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Doubao Global has a larger context window, supporting 256K tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Doubao Global (Sangat cocok untuk penerjemahan multibahasa yang akurat dan komunikasi perusahaan global, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Doubao Global unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Doubao Global memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Doubao Global lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Doubao Global atau Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Doubao Global memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Doubao Global vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global mengenakan biaya $0.15 / $0.45 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 sebesar $2.50 / $10.00. Secara keseluruhan, Doubao Global lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Doubao Global mendukung konteks 256K token dibandingkan 131.1K token pada Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6, sementara Doubao Global unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Doubao Global vs Doubao 1.5 Pro: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Doubao Pro vs Doubao Global: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi ByteDance & Google serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).