Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial
Bagikan
Related topics (4)
AnthropicAlibabaflagshipflagship

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic against Qwen3.8 Max Preview by Alibaba across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Perbandingan Langsung (VS)

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Model Unggulan Garis Depan

Claude Opus 5.5 dari Anthropic adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi AI, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 78 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 94/100, serta ta

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Alibaba

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Model Dasar Bobot Terbuka

Qwen3.8 Max Preview dari Alibaba adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1M, kecepatan 60 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 93/100, serta akses g

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75.2%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 is faster at 78 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 75.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9493
Provider
AnthropicAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$4.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$20.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$3.08 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K32K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
78 tok/s60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
84.6%75.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
82.3%79.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.40 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+9.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Claude Opus 5.5
+30% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

84.6%vs75.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

82.3%vs79.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

91.5%vs89%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1507ptsvs1485pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

19.8%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

66.4%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

58.7%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

83.1%vs77%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

95.4%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

92.6%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

78 tok/s vs60 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview0.68s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Claude Opus 5.57.81s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview9.01s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview saves approximately $24.60 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 84.6% · GPQA Diamond 82.3%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 78 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1400 ms
  • Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $4/$20 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
  • Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Jendela konteks 1M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 32K token (SWE-bench Verified 75.2% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Kecepatan generasi tinggi 60 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 680 ms
  • Bobot terbuka (2.4T total (95B MoE)) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
  • Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$3.85$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
68K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
42K15K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Official API Model ID (SDK)claude-opus-5-5-20260901qwen3-8-max-preview-instruct
API ProtocolAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-07
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026April 2026
ArchitectureExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning TransformerColossus-Scale Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidential2.4T total (95B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP ConnectorsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1488 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 5160 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety EvaluatedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude Opus 5.5 is faster, generating 78 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.68s compared with 1.40s.

Kesimpulan

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for sangat cocok untuk penalaran perusahaan garis depan, pemrograman tingkat lanjut, dan produksi ai, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi., or choose Qwen3.8 Max Preview for sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem rag perusahaan, dan integrasi api skala produksi..

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens, while Qwen3.8 Max Preview costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens whereas Qwen3.8 Max Preview supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Sumber resmi: Anthropic & Alibaba Official Documentation