Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Ditinjau oleh tim riset GetInfoUsPeninjauan terakhir: October 2026Kebijakan editorial

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Claude 3.5 SonnetProfile

Claude 3 OpusProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Pemimpin Pemrograman & Kode

Claude 3.5 Sonnet dari Anthropic adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk rekayasa perangkat lunak otonom, refactoring multi-file, dan debugging mendalam, menghadirkan jendela konteks 200K, kecepatan 80 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 50/100, se

Intelligence Index50 / 100

Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

65%

Anthropic

Claude 3 Opus

Model Generasi Klasik

Claude 3 Opus dari Anthropic adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk asisten percakapan, peringkasan dokumen, dan beban kerja bisnis umum, menghadirkan jendela konteks 200K, kecepatan 30 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 44/100, serta tarif $15/$

Intelligence Index44 / 100

Input Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$75.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

32.2%

Perbedaan Utama Sekilas

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 5.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is faster at 80 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads on SWE-bench coding (65.0% vs 32.2%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet	Claude 3 Opus
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	50	44
Provider	Anthropic	Anthropic
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$3.00 / 1M	$15.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$15.00 / 1M	$75.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$2.31 / 1M	$11.55 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text	200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	4K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	80 tok/s	30 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	65%	32.2%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	59.4%	50.4%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.30 / 1M	$1.50 / 1M

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

+32.8% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

5.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

+167% faster generation

Context

Tied

200K tokens window

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude 3.5 SonnetClaude 3 Opus

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

65%vs32.2%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

59.4%vs50.4%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78%vs74%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1320ptsvs1262pts

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

62%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

80 tok/s vs30 tok/s

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Claude 3.5 Sonnet0.48s

Claude 3 Opus1.20s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Claude 3.5 Sonnet6.73s

Claude 3 Opus17.87s

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Monthly API Bill

$18.45 / month

$3/1M in · $15/1M out

Claude 3 Opus Monthly API Bill

$92.25 / month

$15/1M in · $75/1M out

Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves approximately $73.80 / month (80%) under this workload.5.0x Savings

Claude 3.5 Sonnet · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 200K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 65% · GPQA Diamond 59.4%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 80 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 480 ms
Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $3/$15 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur

Considerations & Trade-offs

Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Claude 3 Opus · Strengths & Key Advantages

Jendela konteks 200K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (SWE-bench Verified 32.2% · GPQA Diamond 50.4%)
Kecepatan generasi tinggi 30 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 1200 ms
Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $15/$75 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur

Considerations & Trade-offs

Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
Untuk trafik produksi skala besar, disarankan mengaktifkan fitur Prompt Caching dan Batch API guna menghemat biaya

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Claude 3.5 Sonnet	Claude 3 Opus
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.20	$0.20
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	24K	24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	0K	0K

Spesifikasi Teknis

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 3 Opus?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more intelligent. It scores 50 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is faster, generating 80 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is cheaper at $2.31 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $11.55 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 1.20s.

Kesimpulan

Baik Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Sangat cocok untuk rekayasa perangkat lunak otonom, refactoring multi-file, dan debugging mendalam, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Claude 3 Opus (Sangat cocok untuk asisten percakapan, peringkasan dokumen, dan beban kerja bisnis umum, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Claude 3.5 Sonnet unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Claude 3.5 Sonnet memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Claude 3.5 Sonnet lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Claude 3.5 Sonnet atau Claude 3 Opus?+

Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.

Berapa perbandingan harga API Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus?+

Claude 3.5 Sonnet mengenakan biaya $3.00 / $15.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Claude 3 Opus sebesar $15.00 / $75.00. Secara keseluruhan, Claude 3.5 Sonnet lebih hemat biaya.

Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+

Claude 3.5 Sonnet mendukung konteks 200K token dibandingkan 200K token pada Claude 3 Opus, sementara Claude 3.5 Sonnet unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet	Claude 3 Opus
Official API Model ID (SDK)	claude-3-5-sonnet-20240601	claude-3-opus-20240301
API Protocol	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date	2024-06	2024-03
Knowledge Cutoff	April 2024	August 2023
Architecture	Next-Gen Multimodal Hybrid Transformer	Frontier Dense Multimodal Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	$0.3/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL	$1.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus

Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3 Opus

Siapa Unggul di Mana?

Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi

Latensi & Waktu Respons

Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif

Claude 3.5 Sonnet · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Claude 3 Opus · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Spesifikasi Teknis

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)

Kesimpulan

Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)

Related reading