Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Llama 5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Qwen3.5 397B-A17BProfile

Llama 5Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Alibaba

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Open-Weights-Basismodell

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B von Alibaba ist ein KI-Modell für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität mit 262K Kontextfenster, 64 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 86/100 und kostenlosem Open-Weight

Intelligence Index86 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

58%

Llama 5

Open-Weights-Basismodell

Llama 5 von Meta ist ein KI-Modell für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität mit 5M Kontextfenster, 65 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 94/100 und kostenlosem Open-Weights-Zugang.

Intelligence Index94 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 262K tokens).
Llama 5 is faster at 65 tok/s vs 64 tok/s.
Llama 5 leads on SWE-bench coding (74.0% vs 58.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Qwen3.5 397B-A17B	Llama 5
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	86	94
Provider	Alibaba	Meta
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text	5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	16K	128K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	64 tok/s	65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	58%	74%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	70%	84%

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Llama 5

+16.0% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Speed

Llama 5

+2% faster generation

Context

Llama 5

5M tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3.5 397B-A17BLlama 5

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

58%vs74%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

70%vs84%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83.5%vs87%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1385ptsvs1485pts

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs68%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs88%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

64 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B0.65s

Llama 50.85s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B8.46s

Llama 58.54s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Llama 5 Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B · Strengths & Key Advantages

262K Kontextfenster und bis zu 16K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 58% · GPQA Diamond 70%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 64 Token/Sekunde bei nur 650 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Offene Modellgewichte (397B total (17B MoE)) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

5M Kontextfenster und bis zu 128K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 74% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 65 Token/Sekunde bei nur 850 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Offene Modellgewichte (600B+ total (~40-80B )) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Qwen3.5 397B-A17B	Llama 5
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	22K	40K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	8K	20K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Llama 5: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Llama 5?

Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 86 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 5 is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 64 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.65s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.

Fazit

Sowohl Qwen3.5 397B-A17B (Optimal für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch Llama 5 (Optimal für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: Llama 5 führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, Llama 5 liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und Qwen3.5 397B-A17B ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – Qwen3.5 397B-A17B oder Llama 5?+

Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt Llama 5 vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.

Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von Qwen3.5 397B-A17B und Llama 5?+

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B kostet $0.00 / $0.00 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, Llama 5 liegt bei $0.00 / $0.00. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist Qwen3.5 397B-A17B günstiger.

Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B bietet 262.1K Tokens Kontext gegenüber 5M Tokens bei Llama 5. Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt Llama 5 vorn.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Feature	Qwen3.5 397B-A17B	Llama 5
Official API Model ID (SDK)	qwen3-5-397b-a17b-instruct	meta-llama/Llama-5
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-02	2026-04
Knowledge Cutoff	December 2025	January 2026
Architecture	Next-Gen Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts	Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active)
Parameters	397B total (17B active MoE)	600B+ total (~40-80B active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 246 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 854 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision, video, audio
Output Modalities	text	text

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Llama 5

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Llama 5

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Technische Spezifikationen

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Llama 5: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Fazit

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Related reading