GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien
Teilen
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Grok Build 0.1 vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning): Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Grok Build 0.1 von xAI und Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) von xAI gehören zu den führenden KI-Modellen. Grok Build 0.1 bietet ein Kontextfenster von 256K Tokens bei API-Preisen von $1.00/$2.00 pro 1M Tokens, während Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1M Tokens Kontext zu $3.00/$15.00 pro 1M Tokens bereitstellt. Hier finden Sie den vollständigen Benchmark-, Latenz- und Kostenvergleich.

Direktvergleich (VS)

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
xAI

Grok Build 0.1

Spitzenmodell für Programmierung

Grok Build 0.1 von xAI ist ein KI-Modell für autonomes Software-Engineering, Code-Refactoring und komplexe Fehleranalyse mit 256K Kontextfenster, 120 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 65/100 und $1/$2 pro 1M Token.

Intelligence Index65 / 100
Input Token:

$1.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

69.8%

xAI

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

Deep-Reasoning-Engine

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) von xAI ist ein KI-Modell für tiefgehendes logisches Denken, komplexe Mathematik und wissenschaftliche Analysen mit 1M Kontextfenster, 95 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 68/100 und $3/$15 pro 1M Token.

Intelligence Index68 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

68.2%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

  • Grok Build 0.1 is 5.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
  • Grok Build 0.1 is faster at 120 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
  • Grok Build 0.1 leads on SWE-bench coding (69.8% vs 68.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGrok Build 0.1Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6568
Provider
xAIxAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.00 / 1M$3.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$2.00 / 1M$15.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.57 / 1M$2.63 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K66K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
120 tok/s95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
69.8%68.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
68.2%72.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.75 / 1M

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Grok Build 0.1
+1.6% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Grok Build 0.1
5.2x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Grok Build 0.1
+26% faster generation
Context
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
1M tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Grok Build 0.1Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

69.8%vs68.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

68.2%vs72.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

82.5%vs84.1%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1375ptsvs1395pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

10.5%vs11.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

46.2%vs44.5%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

42%vs41.2%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68.5%vs66.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

82.1%vs86.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80.4%vs89.2%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

120 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Grok Build 0.10.55s
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)0.98s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Grok Build 0.14.72s
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)6.24s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Grok Build 0.1 Monthly API Bill
$3.67 / month
$1/1M in · $2/1M out
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) Monthly API Bill
$19.13 / month
$3/1M in · $15/1M out
Grok Build 0.1 saves approximately $15.45 / month (81%) under this workload.5.2x Savings

Grok Build 0.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 256K Kontextfenster und bis zu 66K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 69.8% · GPQA Diamond 68.2%)
  • Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 120 Token/Sekunde bei nur 550 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
  • Effiziente API-Struktur ($1/$2 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
  • Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 1M Kontextfenster und bis zu 66K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 68.2% · GPQA Diamond 72.8%)
  • Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 95 Token/Sekunde bei nur 980 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
  • Effiziente API-Struktur ($3/$15 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
  • Bei hohem Anfragevolumen empfiehlt sich der Einsatz von Prompt-Caching und Batch-API zur Kostenoptimierung

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGrok Build 0.1Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.95$1.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
42K45K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
18K28K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGrok Build 0.1Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
Official API Model ID (SDK)grok-build-0-1-latestgrok-4-20-reasoning-latest
API ProtocolxAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)xAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2026-042026-03
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026November 2025
ArchitectureCode-Specialized Autoregressive TransformerColossus-Scale Reasoning Sparse MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1/1M in) across full 256K windowFlat rate ($3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.25/1M tokensCached input at $0.75/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code ExecutionReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code Execution
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationxAI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedxAI Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Grok Build 0.1 vs Grok 4.20 (Reasoning): Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Grok Build 0.1 or Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is more intelligent. It scores 68 compared with 65 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Grok Build 0.1 is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 95 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $0.57 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.63 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Grok Build 0.1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.55s compared with 0.98s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 256K tokens.

Fazit

Sowohl Grok Build 0.1 (Optimal für autonomes Software-Engineering, Code-Refactoring und komplexe Fehleranalyse, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (Optimal für tiefgehendes logisches Denken, komplexe Mathematik und wissenschaftliche Analysen, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, Grok Build 0.1 liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und Grok Build 0.1 ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – Grok Build 0.1 oder Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?+

Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.

Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von Grok Build 0.1 und Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)?+

Grok Build 0.1 kostet $1.00 / $2.00 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) liegt bei $3.00 / $15.00. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist Grok Build 0.1 günstiger.

Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+

Grok Build 0.1 bietet 256K Tokens Kontext gegenüber 1M Tokens bei Grok 4.20 (Reasoning). Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt Grok Build 0.1 vorn.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Offizielle Quellen: Offizielle API-Dokumentation von xAI und xAI, Systemkarten und unabhängige Benchmark-Auswertungen (2026).