GPT-5 Chat vs o3-pro
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
GPT-5 Chat by OpenAI and o3-pro by OpenAI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, GPT-5 Chat holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, GPT-5 Chat is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, o3-pro provides an expanded memory horizon with 200K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-5 Chat leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
GPT-5 Chat
Deep-Reasoning-ModellGPT-5 Chat von OpenAI ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 128K Token zu API-Preisen von $0/1M Input- und $0/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
70%
o3-pro
Deep-Reasoning-Modello3-pro von OpenAI ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 200K Token zu API-Preisen von $20/1M Input- und $80/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$20.00 / 1M
$80.00 / 1M
200K tokens
71.5%
Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick
- GPT-5 Chat is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- o3-pro has a larger context window (200K vs 128K tokens).
- GPT-5 Chat is faster at 140 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
- o3-pro leads on SWE-bench coding (71.5% vs 70.0%).
| Feature | GPT-5 Chat | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 56 | 58 |
Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $80.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $15.50 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 100K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 140 tok/s | 30 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 70% | 71.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 79% | 79.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $5.00 / 1M |
Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?
At-a-glance decision frameworkGeprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenz & Antwortzeit
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT-5 Chat · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Chat-tuned unified reasoning model-Architektur von OpenAI mit 128K Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($0/1M Input, $0/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
o3-pro · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche High-effort reasoning transformer-Architektur von OpenAI mit 200K Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($20/1M Input, $80/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT-5 Chat | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.50 | $11.68 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 54K | 58K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 28K | 38K |
Technische Spezifikationen
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GPT-5 Chat | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-5-chat | o3-pro |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2025-08 | 2025-06 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | September 2024 | June 2024 |
| Architecture | Chat-tuned unified reasoning model | High-effort reasoning transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Flat rate ($20/1M in) across full 200K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix caching at $5/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GPT-5 Chat vs o3-pro: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, GPT-5 Chat or o3-pro?
o3-pro is more intelligent. It scores 58 compared with 56 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-5 Chat is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GPT-5 Chat is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $15.50 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
GPT-5 Chat has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.05s compared with 5.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
o3-pro has a larger context window, supporting 200K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Fazit
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose GPT-5 Chat if your priority is Interactive chat and writing inside ChatGPT. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose o3-pro if your workflow prioritizes Batch and mission-critical analysis rather than chat. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
How does GPT-5 Chat compare to o3-pro in API token pricing and cost per token?+
GPT-5 Chat costs $0.00 per 1M input tokens and $0.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas o3-pro costs $20.00 input and $80.00 output. Overall, GPT-5 Chat is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT-5 Chat or o3-pro?+
GPT-5 Chat supports a context window of 128K tokens (~96k words), while o3-pro supports 200K tokens (~150k words). Therefore, o3-pro can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: GPT-5 Chat or o3-pro?+
GPT-5 Chat scores 70% on SWE-bench Verified while o3-pro scores 71.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, o3-pro holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between GPT-5 Chat and o3-pro?+
GPT-5 Chat features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, o3-pro provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between GPT-5 Chat and o3-pro?+
GPT-5 Chat generates approximately 140 tokens per second, while o3-pro delivers 30 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-5 Chat provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining GPT-5 Chat and o3-pro to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to GPT-5 Chat to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to o3-pro. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5 Chat: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- GPT-5 nano vs GPT-5 Chat: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- o3-pro vs Claude Opus 5.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- o3-pro vs DeepSeek R1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- o3-pro vs Gemini 4 Argon: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- o3-pro vs GPT-6 Astra: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Offizielle Quellen: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs