GPT-4o vs GPT-4 Turbo
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
GPT-4o by OpenAI and GPT-4 Turbo by OpenAI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, GPT-4o holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, GPT-4o is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 128K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-4o leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
GPT-4o
Flaggschiff-Frontier-ModellGPT-4o von OpenAI ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 128K Token zu API-Preisen von $2.5/1M Input- und $10/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$2.50 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
128K tokens
38.8%
GPT-4 Turbo
Flaggschiff-Frontier-ModellGPT-4 Turbo von OpenAI ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 128K Token zu API-Preisen von $10/1M Input- und $30/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$10.00 / 1M
$30.00 / 1M
128K tokens
27.5%
Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick
- GPT-4o is 3.4x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-4o is faster at 105 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
- GPT-4o leads on SWE-bench coding (38.8% vs 27.5%).
| Feature | GPT-4o | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 41 | 40 |
Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $2.50 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $10.00 / 1M | $30.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $2.38 / 1M | $8.50 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 105 tok/s | 55 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 38.8% | 27.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 53.6% | 48% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $1.25 / 1M | $5.00 / 1M |
Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?
At-a-glance decision frameworkGeprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenz & Antwortzeit
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT-4o · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Omni-Multimodal Dense-Architektur von OpenAI mit 128K Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($2.5/1M Input, $10/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
GPT-4 Turbo · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Optimized Sparse MoE-Architektur von OpenAI mit 128K Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($10/1M Input, $30/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT-4o | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.68 | $0.20 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 24K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Technische Spezifikationen
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GPT-4o | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-4o | gpt-4-turbo |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2024-05 | 2023-11 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | October 2023 | December 2023 |
| Architecture | Omni-Multimodal Dense | Optimized Sparse MoE |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $1.25/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix caching at $5/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text, audio | text |
GPT-4o vs GPT-4 Turbo: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, GPT-4o or GPT-4 Turbo?
GPT-4o is more intelligent. It scores 41 compared with 40 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-4o is faster, generating 105 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GPT-4o is cheaper at $2.38 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $8.50 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
GPT-4o has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.41s compared with 0.65s.
Fazit
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose GPT-4o if your priority is Omni-modal voice applications, conversational agents, and structured enterprise APIs. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose GPT-4 Turbo if your workflow prioritizes Enterprise document review, production agent orchestration, and long-form visual analysis. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
How does GPT-4o compare to GPT-4 Turbo in API token pricing and cost per token?+
GPT-4o costs $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00 input and $30.00 output. Overall, GPT-4o is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT-4o or GPT-4 Turbo?+
Both GPT-4o and GPT-4 Turbo offer an identical context window of 128K tokens (~96k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: GPT-4o or GPT-4 Turbo?+
GPT-4o scores 38.8% on SWE-bench Verified while GPT-4 Turbo scores 27.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, GPT-4o holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between GPT-4o and GPT-4 Turbo?+
GPT-4o is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, GPT-4 Turbo focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between GPT-4o and GPT-4 Turbo?+
GPT-4o generates approximately 105 tokens per second, while GPT-4 Turbo delivers 55 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, GPT-4o provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining GPT-4o and GPT-4 Turbo to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to GPT-4o to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to GPT-4 Turbo. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-4o: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- GPT-4 vs GPT-4 Turbo: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- GPT-4o vs Gemini 1.5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Grok 2 vs GPT-4o: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Offizielle Quellen: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs