Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Gemini 4 ArgonProfile

Claude Fable 5.1Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Nativ Multimodale KI

Gemini 4 Argon von Google ist ein KI-Modell für nativ multimodale Verarbeitung von Text und Bild sowie visuelle Dokumentenanalyse mit 1M Kontextfenster, 115 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 97/100 und $2/$10 pro 1M Token.

Intelligence Index97 / 100

Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Frontier-Flaggschiff-Modell

Claude Fable 5.1 von Anthropic ist ein KI-Modell für anspruchsvolles Enterprise-Reasoning, Softwareentwicklung und produktive KI-Workflows mit 1M Kontextfenster, 65 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 82/100 und $10/$50 pro 1M To

Intelligence Index82 / 100

Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.8%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

Gemini 4 Argon is 5.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
Claude Fable 5.1 leads on SWE-bench coding (83.8% vs 81.9%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Gemini 4 Argon	Claude Fable 5.1
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	97	82
Provider	Google	Anthropic
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$2.00 / 1M	$10.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$10.00 / 1M	$50.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$1.47 / 1M	$7.17 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	1000K	128K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	115 tok/s	65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	81.9%	83.8%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	81.5%	81.6%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.10 / 1M	$0.25 / 1M

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Claude Fable 5.1

+1.9% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Gemini 4 Argon

5.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Gemini 4 Argon

+77% faster generation

Context

Tied

1M tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

81.9%vs83.8%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

81.5%vs81.6%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

90.8%vs91%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1525ptsvs1510pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18.9%vsN/A

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

57.4%vs62%

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

56.4%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

80.5%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

94.8%vsN/A

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

96.4%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

115 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Gemini 4 Argon0.85s

Claude Fable 5.11.45s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Claude Fable 5.19.14s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill

$12.15 / month

$2/1M in · $10/1M out

Claude Fable 5.1 Monthly API Bill

$60.38 / month

$10/1M in · $50/1M out

Gemini 4 Argon saves approximately $48.23 / month (80%) under this workload.5.0x Savings

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

1M Kontextfenster und bis zu 1M maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 115 Token/Sekunde bei nur 850 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Effiziente API-Struktur ($2/$10 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe

Considerations & Trade-offs

Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
Bei hohem Anfragevolumen empfiehlt sich der Einsatz von Prompt-Caching und Batch-API zur Kostenoptimierung

Claude Fable 5.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

1M Kontextfenster und bis zu 128K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 83.8% · GPQA Diamond 81.6%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 65 Token/Sekunde bei nur 1450 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Effiziente API-Struktur ($10/$50 pro 1M Token) inklusive Prompt-Caching, Tool-Calling und strikter JSON-Ausgabe

Considerations & Trade-offs

Proprietäres Cloud-Modell ohne Möglichkeit zum lokalen Download der Modellgewichte
Bei hohem Anfragevolumen empfiehlt sich der Einsatz von Prompt-Caching und Batch-API zur Kostenoptimierung

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Gemini 4 Argon	Claude Fable 5.1
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$2.45	$10.97
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	75K	72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	36K	37K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Gemini 4 Argon	Claude Fable 5.1
Official API Model ID (SDK)	models/gemini-4-argon	claude-fable-5-1-20260901
API Protocol	Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date	2026-09	2026-09
Knowledge Cutoff	June 2026	June 2026
Architecture	Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts	Frontier Auditable Multimodal Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL	$0.25/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision, audio, video	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 4 Argon or Claude Fable 5.1?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 82 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.17 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 4 Argon has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 1.45s.

Fazit

Sowohl Gemini 4 Argon (Optimal für nativ multimodale Verarbeitung von Text und Bild sowie visuelle Dokumentenanalyse, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch Claude Fable 5.1 (Optimal für anspruchsvolles Enterprise-Reasoning, Softwareentwicklung und produktive KI-Workflows, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: Gemini 4 Argon führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, Gemini 4 Argon liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und Gemini 4 Argon ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – Gemini 4 Argon oder Claude Fable 5.1?+

Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt Gemini 4 Argon vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.

Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von Gemini 4 Argon und Claude Fable 5.1?+

Gemini 4 Argon kostet $2.00 / $10.00 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, Claude Fable 5.1 liegt bei $10.00 / $50.00. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist Gemini 4 Argon günstiger.

Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+

Gemini 4 Argon bietet 1M Tokens Kontext gegenüber 1M Tokens bei Claude Fable 5.1. Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt Gemini 4 Argon vorn.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Gemini 4 Argon

Claude Fable 5.1

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Claude Fable 5.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Technische Spezifikationen

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Fazit

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Related reading