Doubao Global vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Doubao Global by ByteDance and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 by Google represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Doubao Global holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Doubao Global is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Doubao Global provides an expanded memory horizon with 256K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Doubao Global leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Doubao Global
Deep-Reasoning-ModellDoubao Global von ByteDance ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 256K Token zu API-Preisen von $0.15/1M Input- und $0.45/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$0.15 / 1M
$0.45 / 1M
256K tokens
N/A
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
Deep-Reasoning-ModellGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 von Google ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 131K Token zu API-Preisen von $2.5/1M Input- und $10/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$2.50 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick
- Doubao Global is 20.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Doubao Global has a larger context window (256K vs 131K tokens).
- Doubao Global is faster at 110 tok/s vs 90 tok/s.
| Feature | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 83 | 82 |
Provider | ByteDance | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.15 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.45 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.09 / 1M | $1.85 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 110 tok/s | 90 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 65% | N/A |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.01 / 1M | $0.50 / 1M |
Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenz & Antwortzeit
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Doubao Global · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Globally Optimized Multimodal Transformer-Architektur von ByteDance mit 256K Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($0.15/1M Input, $0.45/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Embodied Spatial Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Model-Architektur von Google mit 131K Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($2.5/1M Input, $10/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.07 | $1.80 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 18K | 12K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 4K | 6K |
Technische Spezifikationen
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | doubao-global | models/gemini-robotics-er-1-6 |
| API Protocol | ByteDance REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Globally Optimized Multimodal Transformer | Embodied Spatial Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.15/1M in) across full 256K window | Flat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 131K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.015/1M tokens | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.5/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | ByteDance Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Doubao Global vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Doubao Global or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?
Doubao Global is more intelligent. It scores 83 compared with 82 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Doubao Global is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 90 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Doubao Global is cheaper at $0.09 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Doubao Global has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.36s compared with 0.70s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Doubao Global has a larger context window, supporting 256K tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.
Fazit
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Doubao Global if your priority is Cross-border e-commerce, international customer support, and multilingual document extraction. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 if your workflow prioritizes Autonomous warehouse robots, humanoid task planning, and physical laboratory automation. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
How does Doubao Global compare to Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Doubao Global costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.45 per 1M output tokens, whereas Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 costs $2.50 input and $10.00 output. Overall, Doubao Global is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Doubao Global or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global supports a context window of 256K tokens (~192k words), while Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 supports 131K tokens (~98k words). Therefore, Doubao Global can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Doubao Global or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, Doubao Global provides robust code generation and tool calling.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Doubao Global and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Doubao Global and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global generates approximately 110 tokens per second, while Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 delivers 90 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Doubao Global provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Doubao Global and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Doubao Global to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Doubao Global vs Doubao 1.5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Doubao Pro vs Doubao Global: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Offizielle Quellen: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs