Veo 2 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Veo 2 by Google and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 by xAI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, both models offer identical input token rates. On output generation, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 1K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
切换并对比任意模型
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Veo 2
旗舰 frontier 大模型Google 推出的 Veo 2 人工智能模型，具备 1K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $5/百万 Token，输出价格为 $350/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$5.00 / 1M
$350.00 / 1M
1K tokens
N/A
Grok Imagine Video 1.5
旗舰 frontier 大模型xAI 推出的 Grok Imagine Video 1.5 人工智能模型，具备 1K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $5/百万 Token，输出价格为 $20/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$5.00 / 1M
$20.00 / 1M
1K tokens
N/A
核心差异一览
- Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is 11.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is faster at 24 tok/s vs 10 tok/s.
| Feature | Veo 2 | Grok Imagine Video 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 75 | 55 |
Provider | xAI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $5.00 / 1M | $5.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $350.00 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $36.00 / 1M | $4.75 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1K tokens~2 A4 pages of text | 1K tokens~2 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 1K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 10 tok/s | 24 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M |
各项指标谁更胜一筹？
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
权威基准测试得分对比
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
延迟与响应速度
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
实时 Token 成本模拟器
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Veo 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 Google 研发的高精度 High-definition video diffusion transformer with camera control 架构，支持 1K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $5/1M，输出 $350/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Grok Imagine Video 1.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 xAI 研发的高精度 Diffusion-Transformer Hybrid (DiT) 架构，支持 1K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $5/1M，输出 $20/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Veo 2 | Grok Imagine Video 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.75 | $0.15 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 0K | 1K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
技术规格参数
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Veo 2 | Grok Imagine Video 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/veo-2 | grok-imagine-video-1-5-latest |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | xAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) |
| Release Date | 2024-12 | 2026-05 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | October 2024 | March 2026 |
| Architecture | High-definition video diffusion transformer with camera control | Diffusion-Transformer Hybrid (DiT) |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($5/1M in) across full 1K window | Flat rate ($5/1M in) across full 1K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0/1M with configurable TTL | Cached input at $2.5/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Text-only completion (No GUI action loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Prompt-based JSON extraction only | Prompt-based JSON extraction only |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Real-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code Execution |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | xAI Production Safety & Alignment Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | video | video |
Veo 2 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Veo 2 or Grok Imagine Video 1.5?
Veo 2 is more intelligent. It scores 75 compared with 55 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is faster, generating 24 tokens per second compared with 10 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is cheaper at $4.75 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $36.00 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Grok Imagine Video 1.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 4.50s compared with 5.00s.
综合结论
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Veo 2 if your priority is B-roll generation, social media video creative, and film prototyping. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Grok Imagine Video 1.5 if your workflow prioritizes Creative media production, dynamic social video clips, advertising storyboards, and conceptual video mockups. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
常见问题 (FAQ)
How does Veo 2 compare to Grok Imagine Video 1.5 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Veo 2 costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $350.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas Grok Imagine Video 1.5 costs $5.00 input and $20.00 output. Overall, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Veo 2 or Grok Imagine Video 1.5?+
Both Veo 2 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 offer an identical context window of 1K tokens (~1k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Veo 2 or Grok Imagine Video 1.5?+
Veo 2 scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Grok Imagine Video 1.5 scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, Veo 2 provides robust code generation and tool calling.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Veo 2 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5?+
Veo 2 is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Veo 2 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5?+
Veo 2 generates approximately 10 tokens per second, while Grok Imagine Video 1.5 delivers 24 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Veo 2 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Grok Imagine Video 1.5 to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Veo 2. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Gemini Omni Flash vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Veo 3.1 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Veo 3 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Veo 3 vs Veo 2: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
数据来源: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs