Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Devstral Medium
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Qwen3 Coder Plus by Alibaba and Devstral Medium by Mistral AI represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, both models offer identical input token rates. On output generation, Devstral Medium is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Qwen3 Coder Plus provides an expanded memory horizon with 1,049K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Qwen3 Coder Plus leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
切换并对比任意模型
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Qwen3 Coder Plus
深度推理模型Alibaba 推出的 Qwen3 Coder Plus 人工智能模型，具备 1.0M 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $0.8/百万 Token，输出价格为 $3.2/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$0.80 / 1M
$3.20 / 1M
1.05M tokens
54%
Devstral Medium
深度推理模型Mistral AI 推出的 Devstral Medium 人工智能模型，具备 128K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $0.8/百万 Token，输出价格为 $2.4/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$0.80 / 1M
$2.40 / 1M
128K tokens
51.5%
核心差异一览
- Devstral Medium is 1.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen3 Coder Plus has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
- Qwen3 Coder Plus is faster at 80 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
- Qwen3 Coder Plus leads on SWE-bench coding (54.0% vs 51.5%).
| Feature | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Devstral Medium |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 85 | 52 |
Provider | Alibaba | Mistral AI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.80 / 1M | $0.80 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $3.20 / 1M | $2.40 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.54 / 1M | $0.54 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 33K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 80 tok/s | 75 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 54% | 51.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 66.5% | 62% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.08 / 1M | $0.20 / 1M |
各项指标谁更胜一筹？
At-a-glance decision framework权威基准测试得分对比
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
延迟与响应速度
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
实时 Token 成本模拟器
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Qwen3 Coder Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 Alibaba 研发的高精度 Hosted Enterprise Code-Specialized Transformer 架构，支持 1.0M 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $0.8/1M，输出 $3.2/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Devstral Medium · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 Mistral AI 研发的高精度 High-Capacity Agentic Code Transformer 架构，支持 128K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $0.8/1M，输出 $2.4/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Devstral Medium |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.22 | $0.55 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 22K | 38K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 7K | 18K |
技术规格参数
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Devstral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwen3-coder-plus-instruct | devstral-medium-latest |
| API Protocol | Alibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Mistral AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) |
| Release Date | 2025-07 | 2025-07 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | May 2025 | May 2025 |
| Architecture | Hosted Enterprise Code-Specialized Transformer | High-Capacity Agentic Code Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential (~70B) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.8/1M in) across full 1049K window | Flat rate ($0.8/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.08/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.2/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Alibaba Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Mistral AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Devstral Medium: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Devstral Medium?
Qwen3 Coder Plus is more intelligent. It scores 85 compared with 52 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen3 Coder Plus is faster, generating 80 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Devstral Medium has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.50s compared with 0.51s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Plus has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 128K tokens.
综合结论
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Qwen3 Coder Plus if your priority is Autonomous coding agents, full-repository refactoring, and complex bug remediation. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Devstral Medium if your workflow prioritizes Autonomous bug-fixing bots, CI/CD pipeline automation, and enterprise repository refactoring. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
常见问题 (FAQ)
How does Qwen3 Coder Plus compare to Devstral Medium in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus costs $0.80 per 1M input tokens and $3.20 per 1M output tokens, whereas Devstral Medium costs $0.80 input and $2.40 output. Overall, Devstral Medium is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Qwen3 Coder Plus or Devstral Medium?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus supports a context window of 1,049K tokens (~786k words), while Devstral Medium supports 128K tokens (~96k words). Therefore, Qwen3 Coder Plus can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Qwen3 Coder Plus or Devstral Medium?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus scores 54% on SWE-bench Verified while Devstral Medium scores 51.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Qwen3 Coder Plus holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Qwen3 Coder Plus and Devstral Medium?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Devstral Medium provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Qwen3 Coder Plus and Devstral Medium?+
Qwen3 Coder Plus generates approximately 80 tokens per second, while Devstral Medium delivers 75 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Qwen3 Coder Plus provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Qwen3 Coder Plus and Devstral Medium to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Devstral Medium to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Qwen3 Coder Plus. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Devstral Medium vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Devstral Medium: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Devstral Medium: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
数据来源: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs