Nano Banana 2 vs Nano Banana Pro
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Google 的 Nano Banana 2 与 Google 的 Nano Banana Pro 是当前备受关注的两款主力 AI 模型。Nano Banana 2 提供 131.1K Token 上下文窗口,API 定价为每百万 Token 输入 $3.00 / 输出 $30.00;而 Nano Banana Pro 提供 65.5K Token 上下文窗口,定价为每百万 Token 输入 $3.50 / 输出 $35.00。以下为两者的基准测试、延迟与成本全面对比。
切换并对比任意模型
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Nano Banana 2
高精度图像生成模型Google 推出的 Nano Banana 2 是一款专注于高分辨率视觉创作、精准文字渲染与图像生成的大模型,具备 131K 上下文窗口、65 Token/秒生成速度与 88/100 综合智能指数(每百万 Token $3 输入 / $30 输出)。
$3.00 / 1M
$30.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
Nano Banana Pro
高精度图像生成模型Google 推出的 Nano Banana Pro 是一款专注于高分辨率视觉创作、精准文字渲染与图像生成的大模型,具备 66K 上下文窗口、50 Token/秒生成速度与 83/100 综合智能指数(每百万 Token $3.5 输入 / $35 输出)。
$3.50 / 1M
$35.00 / 1M
65.5K tokens
N/A
核心差异一览
- Nano Banana 2 is 1.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Nano Banana 2 has a larger context window (131K vs 66K tokens).
- Nano Banana 2 is faster at 65 tok/s vs 50 tok/s.
| Feature | Nano Banana 2 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 88 | 83 |
Provider | ||
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $3.00 / 1M | $3.50 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $30.00 / 1M | $35.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $4.13 / 1M | $4.76 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 65.5K tokens~98 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 65 tok/s | 50 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.75 / 1M | $0.80 / 1M |
各项指标谁更胜一筹?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
权威基准测试得分对比
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
延迟与响应速度
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
实时 Token 成本模拟器
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Nano Banana 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 提供 131K 上下文窗口与最高 16K 输出容量,核心基准表现优异(Arena Elo 1455)
- 高达 65 Token/秒的生成吞吐量,首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 950 毫秒
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价(每百万 Token $3 输入 / $30 输出),原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 闭源专有云端模型,不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
- 在大规模高频调用场景下,建议结合提示词缓存 (Prompt Caching) 与批量 API 以控制成本
Nano Banana Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 提供 66K 上下文窗口与最高 16K 输出容量,核心基准表现优异(Arena Elo 1415)
- 高达 50 Token/秒的生成吞吐量,首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 1200 毫秒
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价(每百万 Token $3.5 输入 / $35 输出),原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 闭源专有云端模型,不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
- 在大规模高频调用场景下,建议结合提示词缓存 (Prompt Caching) 与批量 API 以控制成本
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Nano Banana 2 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.04 | $0.05 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 3K | 2K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 1K | 1K |
技术规格参数
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Nano Banana 2 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/nano-banana-2 | models/nano-banana-pro |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-05 | 2025-11 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | September 2025 |
| Architecture | Frontier conversational multimodal image engine | High-fidelity design-grade image generation and compositional editor |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 131K window | Flat rate ($3.5/1M in) across full 66K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.75/1M with configurable TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.8/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | image | image |
Nano Banana 2 vs Nano Banana Pro: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Nano Banana 2 or Nano Banana Pro?
Nano Banana 2 is more intelligent. It scores 88 compared with 83 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Nano Banana 2 is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 50 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Nano Banana 2 is cheaper at $4.13 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $4.76 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Nano Banana 2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.95s compared with 1.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Nano Banana 2 has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 65.5K tokens.
综合结论
综合来看,Nano Banana 2(适合:专注于高分辨率视觉创作、精准文字渲染与图像生成的任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。)与 Nano Banana Pro(适合:专注于高分辨率视觉创作、精准文字渲染与图像生成的任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。)各具优势:Nano Banana 2 在综合智能与编程基准测试中表现更强,Nano Banana 2 拥有更快的 Token 生成速度,而 Nano Banana 2 则在规模化 API 部署中具备更高的成本效益。
常见问题 (FAQ)
在编程和深度推理方面,Nano Banana 2 和 Nano Banana Pro 哪个更强?+
在综合智能指数与编程基准评测中,Nano Banana 2 表现占优。建议结合上方的 SWE-bench Verified 与 GPQA Diamond 跑分根据具体场景选择。
Nano Banana 2 与 Nano Banana Pro 的 API 价格哪个更便宜?+
Nano Banana 2 的 API 价格为输入 $3.00 / 输出 $30.00(每百万 Token),Nano Banana Pro 为输入 $3.50 / 输出 $35.00。综合混合成本来看,Nano Banana 2 更具性价比。
哪款模型拥有更大的上下文窗口和更快的响应速度?+
Nano Banana 2 支持 131.1K Token 上下文窗口,而 Nano Banana Pro 支持 65.5K Token。在流式生成速度方面,Nano Banana 2 的吞吐表现更快。
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- GPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana Pro:基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana 2:基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Nano Banana Pro vs Nano Banana:基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini:基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash:基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1:基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
数据来源: Google 与 Google 官方 API 文档、模型发布说明及独立基准测试报告 (2026)。