Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

由 GetInfoUs 研究团队审核最后审核日期:October 2026编辑政策
分享
Related topics (4)
OpenAIOpenAIflagshipflagship

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI against GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

模型直接对比 (VS)

切换并对比任意模型

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

深度推理模型

OpenAI 推出的 GPT-6.1 Sol 人工智能模型,具备 1M 上下文窗口,输入价格为 $2.0/百万 Token,输出价格为 $10.0/百万 Token,专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.3%

OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol

深度推理模型

OpenAI 推出的 GPT-6 Sol 人工智能模型,具备 1M 上下文窗口,输入价格为 $2.0/百万 Token,输出价格为 $10.0/百万 Token,专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.1%

核心差异一览

  • Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 116 tok/s.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 82.1%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Sol
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9493
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
120 tok/s116 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
82.3%82.1%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
80.8%80.6%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

各项指标谁更胜一筹?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6.1 Sol
+0.2% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Tied
Identical monthly runtime cost
Speed
GPT-6.1 Sol
+3% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

权威基准测试得分对比

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

82.3%vs82.1%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

80.8%vs80.6%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.9%vs89.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1519ptsvs1516pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18.1%vs18%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

63.6%vs63.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

54.8%vs54.5%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

79.7%vs79.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

93.5%vs93.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

91%vs90.8%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

120 tok/s vs116 tok/s

延迟与响应速度

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-6.1 Sol1.12s
GPT-6 Sol1.16s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-6.1 Sol5.29s
GPT-6 Sol5.47s

实时 Token 成本模拟器

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-6.1 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
GPT-6 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 由 OpenAI 研发的高精度 Near-Astra unified reasoning model 架构,支持 1M 上下文窗口
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价(输入 $2.0/1M,输出 $10.0/1M),支持高速推理与工具调用
  • 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
  • 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强(RAG)以获得最佳效果

GPT-6 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 由 OpenAI 研发的高精度 Cost-efficient frontier unified reasoning model 架构,支持 1M 上下文窗口
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价(输入 $2.0/1M,输出 $10.0/1M),支持高速推理与工具调用
  • 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
  • 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强(RAG)以获得最佳效果

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Sol
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.05$2.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
62K62K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K36K

技术规格参数

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Sol
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-6-1-solgpt-6-sol
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026April 2026
ArchitectureNear-Astra unified reasoning modelCost-efficient frontier unified reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 116 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-6.1 Sol has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.12s compared with 1.16s.

综合结论

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for 企业级 ai 自动化、代码研发、智能体(agent)工作流以及 openai 生态深度集成, or choose GPT-6 Sol for 企业级 ai 自动化、代码研发、智能体(agent)工作流以及 openai 生态深度集成.

常见问题 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Sol?+

GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Sol?+

GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens whereas GPT-6 Sol supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

数据来源: OpenAI & OpenAI Official Documentation