Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.3 Chat

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

由 GetInfoUs 研究团队审核最后审核日期:October 2026编辑政策
分享
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.3 Chat: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

OpenAI 的 GPT-5.4 nano 与 OpenAI 的 GPT-5.3 Chat 是当前备受关注的两款主力 AI 模型。GPT-5.4 nano 提供 400K Token 上下文窗口,API 定价为每百万 Token 输入 $0.10 / 输出 $0.80;而 GPT-5.3 Chat 提供 128K Token 上下文窗口,定价为每百万 Token 输入 $0.00 / 输出 $0.00。以下为两者的基准测试、延迟与成本全面对比。

模型直接对比 (VS)

切换并对比任意模型

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 nano

轻量级高性价比模型

OpenAI 推出的 GPT-5.4 nano 是一款兼顾极低 API 调用成本与高吞吐效率的轻量级大模型,具备 400K 上下文窗口、235 Token/秒生成速度与 45/100 综合智能指数(每百万 Token $0.1 输入 / $0.8 输出)。

Intelligence Index45 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

48%

OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Chat

旗舰前沿大模型

OpenAI 推出的 GPT-5.3 Chat 是一款面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿大模型,具备 128K 上下文窗口、138 Token/秒生成速度与 69/100 综合智能指数(免费开源权重)。

Intelligence Index69 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

77%

核心差异一览

  • GPT-5.3 Chat is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5.4 nano has a larger context window (400K vs 128K tokens).
  • GPT-5.4 nano is faster at 235 tok/s vs 138 tok/s.
  • GPT-5.3 Chat leads on SWE-bench coding (77.0% vs 48.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.3 Chat
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4569
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.80 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.11 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
235 tok/s138 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
48%77%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
61.5%78%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

各项指标谁更胜一筹?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-5.3 Chat
+29.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-5.3 Chat
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-5.4 nano
+70% faster generation
Context
GPT-5.4 nano
400K tokens window

权威基准测试得分对比

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.3 Chat
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

48%vs77%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

61.5%vs78%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75.8%vs88%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1310ptsvs1416pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

8.6%vs14.4%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

26%vs52.5%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

28%vs48%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

51.5%vs76%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

78%vs93.6%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

66.5%vs83%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

235 tok/s vs138 tok/s

延迟与响应速度

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-5.4 nano0.40s
GPT-5.3 Chat1.06s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-5.4 nano2.53s
GPT-5.3 Chat4.68s

实时 Token 成本模拟器

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-5.4 nano Monthly API Bill
$0.89 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.8/1M out
GPT-5.3 Chat Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
GPT-5.3 Chat saves approximately $0.89 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT-5.4 nano · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 400K 上下文窗口与最高 128K 输出容量,核心基准表现优异(SWE-bench Verified 48% · GPQA Diamond 61.5%)
  • 高达 235 Token/秒的生成吞吐量,首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 400 毫秒
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价(每百万 Token $0.1 输入 / $0.8 输出),原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 闭源专有云端模型,不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
  • 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上,深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型

GPT-5.3 Chat · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 128K 上下文窗口与最高 16K 输出容量,核心基准表现优异(SWE-bench Verified 77% · GPQA Diamond 78%)
  • 高达 138 Token/秒的生成吞吐量,首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 1060 毫秒
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价(免费开源权重),原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 闭源专有云端模型,不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
  • 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上,深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.3 Chat
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.11$2.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
44K56K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
19K31K

技术规格参数

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.3 Chat
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-5-4-nanogpt-5-3-chat
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-032026-03
Knowledge CutoffAugust 2025November 2025
ArchitectureNano agent-ready reasoning modelChat-tuned unified reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 400K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.3 Chat: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.4 nano or GPT-5.3 Chat?

GPT-5.3 Chat is more intelligent. It scores 69 compared with 45 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.4 nano is faster, generating 235 tokens per second compared with 138 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5.3 Chat is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.11 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-5.4 nano has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.40s compared with 1.06s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5.4 nano has a larger context window, supporting 400K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

综合结论

综合来看,GPT-5.4 nano(适合:兼顾极低 API 调用成本与高吞吐效率的轻量级任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。)与 GPT-5.3 Chat(适合:面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。)各具优势:GPT-5.3 Chat 在综合智能与编程基准测试中表现更强,GPT-5.4 nano 拥有更快的 Token 生成速度,而 GPT-5.3 Chat 则在规模化 API 部署中具备更高的成本效益。

常见问题 (FAQ)

在编程和深度推理方面,GPT-5.4 nano 和 GPT-5.3 Chat 哪个更强?+

在综合智能指数与编程基准评测中,GPT-5.3 Chat 表现占优。建议结合上方的 SWE-bench Verified 与 GPQA Diamond 跑分根据具体场景选择。

GPT-5.4 nano 与 GPT-5.3 Chat 的 API 价格哪个更便宜?+

GPT-5.4 nano 的 API 价格为输入 $0.10 / 输出 $0.80(每百万 Token),GPT-5.3 Chat 为输入 $0.00 / 输出 $0.00。综合混合成本来看,GPT-5.3 Chat 更具性价比。

哪款模型拥有更大的上下文窗口和更快的响应速度?+

GPT-5.4 nano 支持 400K Token 上下文窗口,而 GPT-5.3 Chat 支持 128K Token。在流式生成速度方面,GPT-5.4 nano 的吞吐表现更快。

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

数据来源: OpenAI 与 OpenAI 官方 API 文档、模型发布说明及独立基准测试报告 (2026)。