Gemini 2.5 Computer Use vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Google 的 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 与 Google 的 Gemini 2.5 Flash 是当前备受关注的两款主力 AI 模型。Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 提供 128K Token 上下文窗口，API 定价为每百万 Token 输入 $1.50 / 输出 $8.00；而 Gemini 2.5 Flash 提供 1.05M Token 上下文窗口，定价为每百万 Token 输入 $0.30 / 输出 $2.50。以下为两者的基准测试、延迟与成本全面对比。
切换并对比任意模型
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
自主智能体与工具专家Google 推出的 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 是一款专为长周期自主智能体 (Agent)、工具调用与自动化工作流打造的大模型，具备 128K 上下文窗口、85 Token/秒生成速度与 65/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $1.5 输入 / $8 输出）。
$1.50 / 1M
$8.00 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
Gemini 2.5 Flash
超高速低延迟推理Google 推出的 Gemini 2.5 Flash 是一款面向实时交互对话、高并发路由与极低延迟生产环境的超高速大模型，具备 1.0M 上下文窗口、160 Token/秒生成速度与 68/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $0.3 输入 / $2.5 输出）。
$0.30 / 1M
$2.50 / 1M
1.05M tokens
58.2%
核心差异一览
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is 3.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 2.5 Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster at 160 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
| Feature | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 65 | 68 |
Provider | ||
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.50 / 1M | $0.30 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $8.00 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.36 / 1M | $0.36 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 66K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 85 tok/s | 160 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 58.2% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 75.4% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.38 / 1M | $0.07 / 1M |
各项指标谁更胜一筹？
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
权威基准测试得分对比
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
延迟与响应速度
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
实时 Token 成本模拟器
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 提供 128K 上下文窗口与最高 16K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（Arena Elo 1365）
- 高达 85 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 650 毫秒
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（每百万 Token $1.5 输入 / $8 输出），原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 闭源专有云端模型，不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
- 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上，深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型
Gemini 2.5 Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 提供 1.0M 上下文窗口与最高 66K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（SWE-bench Verified 58.2% · GPQA Diamond 75.4%）
- 高达 160 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 450 毫秒
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（每百万 Token $0.3 输入 / $2.5 输出），原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 闭源专有云端模型，不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
- 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上，深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.15 | $0.85 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 32K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 6K | 14K |
技术规格参数
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-2-5-computer-use | models/gemini-2-5-flash |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2025-10 | 2025-06 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | June 2025 | March 2025 |
| Architecture | Action-grounded vision-language agent model | High-throughput sparse multimodal transformer with thinking mode |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 128K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.375/1M with configurable TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.075/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is more intelligent. It scores 68 compared with 65 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster, generating 160 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.36 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.36 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.45s compared with 0.65s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 128K tokens.
综合结论
综合来看，Gemini 2.5 Computer Use（适合：专为长周期自主智能体 (Agent)、工具调用与自动化工作流打造的任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）与 Gemini 2.5 Flash（适合：面向实时交互对话、高并发路由与极低延迟生产环境的超高速任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）各具优势：Gemini 2.5 Flash 在综合智能与编程基准测试中表现更强，Gemini 2.5 Flash 拥有更快的 Token 生成速度，而 Gemini 2.5 Flash 则在规模化 API 部署中具备更高的成本效益。
常见问题 (FAQ)
在编程和深度推理方面，Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 和 Gemini 2.5 Flash 哪个更强？+
在综合智能指数与编程基准评测中，Gemini 2.5 Flash 表现占优。建议结合上方的 SWE-bench Verified 与 GPQA Diamond 跑分根据具体场景选择。
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 与 Gemini 2.5 Flash 的 API 价格哪个更便宜？+
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 的 API 价格为输入 $1.50 / 输出 $8.00（每百万 Token），Gemini 2.5 Flash 为输入 $0.30 / 输出 $2.50。综合混合成本来看，Gemini 2.5 Flash 更具性价比。
哪款模型拥有更大的上下文窗口和更快的响应速度？+
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 支持 128K Token 上下文窗口，而 Gemini 2.5 Flash 支持 1.05M Token。在流式生成速度方面，Gemini 2.5 Flash 的吞吐表现更快。
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use：基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite：基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GLM-4.5-Flash：基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini：基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash：基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1：基准测试、API 价格与速度全面对比 (2026)对比
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
数据来源: Google 与 Google 官方 API 文档、模型发布说明及独立基准测试报告 (2026)。