GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs ERNIE 4.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

由 GetInfoUs 研究团队审核最后审核日期：October 2026编辑政策
分享
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
ERNIE 5.0 vs ERNIE 4.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Baidu 的 ERNIE 5.0 与 Baidu 的 ERNIE 4.5 是当前备受关注的两款主力 AI 模型。ERNIE 5.0 提供 128K Token 上下文窗口，API 定价为每百万 Token 输入 $1.50 / 输出 $6.00；而 ERNIE 4.5 提供 128K Token 上下文窗口，定价为每百万 Token 输入 $0.60 / 输出 $2.40。以下为两者的基准测试、延迟与成本全面对比。

模型直接对比 (VS)

切换并对比任意模型

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Baidu

ERNIE 5.0

旗舰前沿大模型

Baidu 推出的 ERNIE 5.0 是一款面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿大模型，具备 128K 上下文窗口、70 Token/秒生成速度与 90/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $1.5 输入 / $6 输出）。

Intelligence Index90 / 100
Input Token:

$1.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

60%

Baidu

ERNIE 4.5

旗舰前沿大模型

Baidu 推出的 ERNIE 4.5 是一款面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿大模型，具备 128K 上下文窗口、75 Token/秒生成速度与 81/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $0.6 输入 / $2.4 输出）。

Intelligence Index81 / 100
Input Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.40 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

核心差异一览

  • ERNIE 4.5 is 2.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • ERNIE 4.5 is faster at 75 tok/s vs 70 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureERNIE 5.0ERNIE 4.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9081
Provider
BaiduBaidu
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.50 / 1M$0.60 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$6.00 / 1M$2.40 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.01 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
70 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
60%N/A
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
74.5%60%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.15 / 1M$0.06 / 1M

各项指标谁更胜一筹？

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
ERNIE 4.5
2.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
ERNIE 4.5
+7% faster generation
Context
Tied
128K tokens window

权威基准测试得分对比

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

ERNIE 5.0ERNIE 4.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

60%vsN/A
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

74.5%vs60%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86%vs78.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1430ptsvs1325pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

70 tok/s vs75 tok/s

延迟与响应速度

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
ERNIE 5.00.58s
ERNIE 4.50.51s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
ERNIE 5.07.72s
ERNIE 4.57.18s

实时 Token 成本模拟器

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
ERNIE 5.0 Monthly API Bill
$7.88 / month
$1.5/1M in · $6/1M out
ERNIE 4.5 Monthly API Bill
$3.15 / month
$0.6/1M in · $2.4/1M out
ERNIE 4.5 saves approximately $4.72 / month (60%) under this workload.2.5x Savings

ERNIE 5.0 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 128K 上下文窗口与最高 16K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（SWE-bench Verified 60% · GPQA Diamond 74.5%）
  • 高达 70 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 580 毫秒
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价（每百万 Token $1.5 输入 / $6 输出），原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 闭源专有云端模型，不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
  • 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上，深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型

ERNIE 4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 128K 上下文窗口与最高 8K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（GPQA Diamond 60% · MMLU-Pro 78.5%）
  • 高达 75 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 510 毫秒
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价（每百万 Token $0.6 输入 / $2.4 输出），原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 闭源专有云端模型，不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
  • 在超长链路的前沿科研推导任务上，深度略逊于顶配重型旗舰推理模型

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricERNIE 5.0ERNIE 4.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.32$0.16
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
25K18K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
9K4K

技术规格参数

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureERNIE 5.0ERNIE 4.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)ernie-5-0ernie-4-5
API ProtocolBaidu REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)Baidu REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2026-052025-03
Knowledge CutoffFebruary 2026December 2024
ArchitectureColossus-Scale Omnimodal MoE TransformerMultimodal Foundation Knowledge Transformer
Parameters800B total (45B active MoE)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($0.6/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.15/1M tokensCached input at $0.06/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationBaidu Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedBaidu Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, audio
Output Modalitiestexttext

ERNIE 5.0 vs ERNIE 4.5: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, ERNIE 5.0 or ERNIE 4.5?

ERNIE 5.0 is more intelligent. It scores 90 compared with 81 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

ERNIE 4.5 is faster, generating 75 tokens per second compared with 70 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

ERNIE 4.5 is cheaper at $0.40 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.01 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

ERNIE 4.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.51s compared with 0.58s.

综合结论

综合来看，ERNIE 5.0（适合：面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）与 ERNIE 4.5（适合：面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）各具优势：ERNIE 5.0 在综合智能与编程基准测试中表现更强，ERNIE 4.5 拥有更快的 Token 生成速度，而 ERNIE 4.5 则在规模化 API 部署中具备更高的成本效益。

常见问题 (FAQ)

在编程和深度推理方面，ERNIE 5.0 和 ERNIE 4.5 哪个更强？+

在综合智能指数与编程基准评测中，ERNIE 5.0 表现占优。建议结合上方的 SWE-bench Verified 与 GPQA Diamond 跑分根据具体场景选择。

ERNIE 5.0 与 ERNIE 4.5 的 API 价格哪个更便宜？+

ERNIE 5.0 的 API 价格为输入 $1.50 / 输出 $6.00（每百万 Token），ERNIE 4.5 为输入 $0.60 / 输出 $2.40。综合混合成本来看，ERNIE 4.5 更具性价比。

哪款模型拥有更大的上下文窗口和更快的响应速度？+

ERNIE 5.0 支持 128K Token 上下文窗口，而 ERNIE 4.5 支持 128K Token。在流式生成速度方面，ERNIE 4.5 的吞吐表现更快。

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

数据来源: Baidu 与 Baidu 官方 API 文档、模型发布说明及独立基准测试报告 (2026)。