Doubao Global vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Doubao Global by ByteDance and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 by Google represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Doubao Global holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Doubao Global is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Doubao Global provides an expanded memory horizon with 256K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Doubao Global leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
切换并对比任意模型
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Doubao Global
深度推理模型ByteDance 推出的 Doubao Global 人工智能模型，具备 256K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $0.15/百万 Token，输出价格为 $0.45/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$0.15 / 1M
$0.45 / 1M
256K tokens
N/A
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
深度推理模型Google 推出的 Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 人工智能模型，具备 131K 上下文窗口，输入价格为 $2.5/百万 Token，输出价格为 $10/百万 Token，专为高质量生产环境、推理与自动化工作流打造。
$2.50 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
核心差异一览
- Doubao Global is 20.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Doubao Global has a larger context window (256K vs 131K tokens).
- Doubao Global is faster at 110 tok/s vs 90 tok/s.
| Feature | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 83 | 82 |
Provider | ByteDance | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.15 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.45 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.09 / 1M | $1.85 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 16K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 110 tok/s | 90 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 65% | N/A |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.01 / 1M | $0.50 / 1M |
各项指标谁更胜一筹？
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
权威基准测试得分对比
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
延迟与响应速度
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
实时 Token 成本模拟器
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Doubao Global · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 ByteDance 研发的高精度 Globally Optimized Multimodal Transformer 架构，支持 256K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $0.15/1M，输出 $0.45/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 由 Google 研发的高精度 Embodied Spatial Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Model 架构，支持 131K 上下文窗口
- 极具竞争力的 API 定价（输入 $2.5/1M，输出 $10/1M），支持高速推理与工具调用
- 在代码生成、逻辑推理与多语言处理基准测试中表现出色
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 超长上下文请求需要规划 Token 成本与并发配额
- 针对特定垂直领域任务建议结合系统提示词与检索增强（RAG）以获得最佳效果
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.07 | $1.80 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 18K | 12K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 4K | 6K |
技术规格参数
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Doubao Global | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | doubao-global | models/gemini-robotics-er-1-6 |
| API Protocol | ByteDance REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Globally Optimized Multimodal Transformer | Embodied Spatial Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Model |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.15/1M in) across full 256K window | Flat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 131K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.015/1M tokens | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.5/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | ByteDance Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Doubao Global vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Doubao Global or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?
Doubao Global is more intelligent. It scores 83 compared with 82 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Doubao Global is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 90 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Doubao Global is cheaper at $0.09 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Doubao Global has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.36s compared with 0.70s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Doubao Global has a larger context window, supporting 256K tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.
综合结论
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Doubao Global if your priority is Cross-border e-commerce, international customer support, and multilingual document extraction. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 if your workflow prioritizes Autonomous warehouse robots, humanoid task planning, and physical laboratory automation. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
常见问题 (FAQ)
How does Doubao Global compare to Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Doubao Global costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.45 per 1M output tokens, whereas Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 costs $2.50 input and $10.00 output. Overall, Doubao Global is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Doubao Global or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global supports a context window of 256K tokens (~192k words), while Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 supports 131K tokens (~98k words). Therefore, Doubao Global can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Doubao Global or Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, Doubao Global provides robust code generation and tool calling.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Doubao Global and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Doubao Global and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?+
Doubao Global generates approximately 110 tokens per second, while Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 delivers 90 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Doubao Global provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Doubao Global and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Doubao Global to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Doubao Global vs Doubao 1.5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Doubao Pro vs Doubao Global: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison对比
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
数据来源: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs