GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

由 GetInfoUs 研究团队审核最后审核日期：October 2026编辑政策
分享
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Anthropic 的 Claude Opus 4.6 与 Anthropic 的 Claude Sonnet 4.6 是当前备受关注的两款主力 AI 模型。Claude Opus 4.6 提供 1M Token 上下文窗口，API 定价为每百万 Token 输入 $5.00 / 输出 $25.00；而 Claude Sonnet 4.6 提供 1M Token 上下文窗口，定价为每百万 Token 输入 $3.00 / 输出 $15.00。以下为两者的基准测试、延迟与成本全面对比。

模型直接对比 (VS)

切换并对比任意模型

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

深度逻辑推理引擎

Anthropic 推出的 Claude Opus 4.6 是一款专为博士级数理逻辑、科学推导与多步思维链 (CoT) 设计的深度推理大模型，具备 1M 上下文窗口、55 Token/秒生成速度与 65/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $5 输入 / $25 输出）。

Intelligence Index65 / 100
Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

78.4%

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6

旗舰前沿大模型

Anthropic 推出的 Claude Sonnet 4.6 是一款面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿大模型，具备 1M 上下文窗口、92 Token/秒生成速度与 60/100 综合智能指数（每百万 Token $3 输入 / $15 输出）。

Intelligence Index60 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.1%

核心差异一览

  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 92 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 4.6 leads on SWE-bench coding (78.4% vs 76.1%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6560
Provider
AnthropicAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$5.00 / 1M$3.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$25.00 / 1M$15.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$3.85 / 1M$2.31 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
55 tok/s92 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
78.4%76.1%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
76.5%74%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.30 / 1M

各项指标谁更胜一筹？

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 4.6
+2.3% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Claude Sonnet 4.6
1.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6
+67% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

权威基准测试得分对比

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

78.4%vs76.1%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

76.5%vs74%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.2%vs86.7%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1395ptsvs1380pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

51.4%vs47.8%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

55 tok/s vs92 tok/s

延迟与响应速度

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Claude Opus 4.61.90s
Claude Sonnet 4.60.65s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Claude Opus 4.610.99s
Claude Sonnet 4.66.08s

实时 Token 成本模拟器

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Claude Opus 4.6 Monthly API Bill
$30.75 / month
$5/1M in · $25/1M out
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Monthly API Bill
$18.45 / month
$3/1M in · $15/1M out
Claude Sonnet 4.6 saves approximately $12.30 / month (40%) under this workload.1.7x Savings

Claude Opus 4.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 1M 上下文窗口与最高 128K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（SWE-bench Verified 78.4% · GPQA Diamond 76.5%）
  • 高达 55 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 1900 毫秒
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价（每百万 Token $5 输入 / $25 输出），原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 闭源专有云端模型，不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
  • 在大规模高频调用场景下，建议结合提示词缓存 (Prompt Caching) 与批量 API 以控制成本

Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 提供 1M 上下文窗口与最高 128K 输出容量，核心基准表现优异（SWE-bench Verified 76.1% · GPQA Diamond 74%）
  • 高达 92 Token/秒的生成吞吐量，首字延迟 (TTFT) 仅约 650 毫秒
  • 极具竞争力的 API 定价（每百万 Token $3 输入 / $15 输出），原生支持提示词缓存、函数调用与结构化 JSON 输出
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 闭源专有云端模型，不支持下载权重进行离线本地物理隔离部署
  • 在大规模高频调用场景下，建议结合提示词缓存 (Prompt Caching) 与批量 API 以控制成本

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$5.49$3.29
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
72K72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
37K37K

技术规格参数

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6
Official API Model ID (SDK)claude-opus-4-6-20260201claude-sonnet-4-6-20260201
API ProtocolAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AIAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2026-022026-02
Knowledge CutoffDecember 2025December 2025
ArchitectureMegacontext Frontier Reasoning TransformerHigh-Throughput Multimodal Agent Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL$0.3/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP ConnectorsNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt DistillationCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety EvaluatedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: 常见问题解答 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Opus 4.6 is more intelligent. It scores 65 compared with 60 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster, generating 92 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper at $2.31 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.65s compared with 1.90s.

综合结论

综合来看，Claude Opus 4.6（适合：专为博士级数理逻辑、科学推导与多步思维链 (CoT) 设计的深度推理任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）与 Claude Sonnet 4.6（适合：面向复杂企业级推理、软件开发与全场景生产工作流的旗舰前沿任务、企业级 RAG 检索增强生成、自动化智能体工作流与高可靠 API 集成。）各具优势：Claude Opus 4.6 在综合智能与编程基准测试中表现更强，Claude Sonnet 4.6 拥有更快的 Token 生成速度，而 Claude Sonnet 4.6 则在规模化 API 部署中具备更高的成本效益。

常见问题 (FAQ)

在编程和深度推理方面，Claude Opus 4.6 和 Claude Sonnet 4.6 哪个更强？+

在综合智能指数与编程基准评测中，Claude Opus 4.6 表现占优。建议结合上方的 SWE-bench Verified 与 GPQA Diamond 跑分根据具体场景选择。

Claude Opus 4.6 与 Claude Sonnet 4.6 的 API 价格哪个更便宜？+

Claude Opus 4.6 的 API 价格为输入 $5.00 / 输出 $25.00（每百万 Token），Claude Sonnet 4.6 为输入 $3.00 / 输出 $15.00。综合混合成本来看，Claude Sonnet 4.6 更具性价比。

哪款模型拥有更大的上下文窗口和更快的响应速度？+

Claude Opus 4.6 支持 1M Token 上下文窗口，而 Claude Sonnet 4.6 支持 1M Token。在流式生成速度方面，Claude Sonnet 4.6 的吞吐表现更快。

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

数据来源: Anthropic 与 Anthropic 官方 API 文档、模型发布说明及独立基准测试报告 (2026)。