Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Mistral Large 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Mistral Large 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Mistral Large 2 da Mistral AI e Mistral Medium 3.5 da Mistral AI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Mistral Large 2 oferece uma janela de contexto de 128K tokens a $2.00/$6.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Mistral Medium 3.5 oferece 262.1K tokens de contexto a $0.40/$2.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Mistral Large 2

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Mistral Large 2 da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 75 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 46/100

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

38%

Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.5

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Mistral Medium 3.5 da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 262K, velocidade de 90 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 55/

Intelligence Index55 / 100
Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

54%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Mistral Medium 3.5 is 3.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has a larger context window (262K vs 128K tokens).
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 is faster at 90 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (54.0% vs 38.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureMistral Large 2Mistral Medium 3.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4655
Provider
Mistral AIMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.40 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$6.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.70 / 1M$0.35 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K33K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
75 tok/s90 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
38%54%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
54%68%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$1.00 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Mistral Medium 3.5
+16.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Mistral Medium 3.5
3.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.5
+20% faster generation
Context
Mistral Medium 3.5
262.1K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Mistral Large 2Mistral Medium 3.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

38%vs54%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

54%vs68%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

76.5%vs84.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1282ptsvs1370pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs46%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs78%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs85%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

75 tok/s vs90 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Mistral Large 20.52s
Mistral Medium 3.50.45s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Mistral Large 27.19s
Mistral Medium 3.56.01s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Mistral Large 2 Monthly API Bill
$9.90 / month
$2/1M in · $6/1M out
Mistral Medium 3.5 Monthly API Bill
$2.55 / month
$0.4/1M in · $2/1M out
Mistral Medium 3.5 saves approximately $7.35 / month (74%) under this workload.3.9x Savings

Mistral Large 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 38% · GPQA Diamond 54%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 75 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 520 ms
  • Pesos abertos (123B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Mistral Medium 3.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 262K com limite máximo de saída de 33K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 54% · GPQA Diamond 68%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 90 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 450 ms
  • Pesos abertos (Confidential (~80B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricMistral Large 2Mistral Medium 3.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.20$0.38
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K38K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K18K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureMistral Large 2Mistral Medium 3.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)mistral-large-2-latestmistral-medium-3-5-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-072026-04
Knowledge CutoffJuly 2024February 2026
Architecture123B Dense Frontier TransformerEnterprise Hybrid Reasoning MoE
Parameters123BConfidential (~80B MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($0.4/1M in) across full 262K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $1/1M tokensCached input at $0.1/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 76 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 264 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 50 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 172 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Mistral Large 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Mistral Large 2 or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is more intelligent. It scores 55 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is faster, generating 90 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper at $0.35 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral Medium 3.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.45s compared with 0.52s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.5 has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Mistral Large 2 (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Mistral Medium 3.5 (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Mistral Medium 3.5 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Mistral Medium 3.5 oferece geração mais rápida e Mistral Medium 3.5 apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Mistral Large 2 ou Mistral Medium 3.5?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Mistral Medium 3.5 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Mistral Large 2 ou Mistral Medium 3.5?+

O Mistral Large 2 custa $2.00 / $6.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Mistral Medium 3.5 custa $0.40 / $2.00. No custo combinado, Mistral Medium 3.5 é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Mistral Large 2 suporta 128K tokens de contexto contra 262.1K tokens do Mistral Medium 3.5, enquanto Mistral Medium 3.5 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Mistral AI e Mistral AI e benchmarks independentes (2026).