Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) da xAI e Gemini 4 Argon da Google são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) oferece uma janela de contexto de 1M tokens a $3.00/$15.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Gemini 4 Argon oferece 1M tokens de contexto a $2.00/$10.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.
Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
Motor de Raciocínio ProfundoO Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) da xAI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 95 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 68
$3.00 / 1M
$15.00 / 1M
1M tokens
68.2%
Gemini 4 Argon
IA Multimodal NativaO Gemini 4 Argon da Google é um modelo de IA projetado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 115 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 97/100 e
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
Principais Diferenças em Resumo
- Gemini 4 Argon is 1.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 95 tok/s.
- Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 68.2%).
| Feature | Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 68 | 97 |
Provider | xAI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $3.00 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $15.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $2.63 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 66K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 95 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 68.2% | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 72.8% | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.75 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Quem vence em cada categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latência e Tempo de Resposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 66K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 68.2% · GPQA Diamond 72.8%)
- Taxa de transferência rápida de 95 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 980 ms
- Economia de API competitiva ($3/$15 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
- Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 1M tokens (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
- Taxa de transferência rápida de 115 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 850 ms
- Economia de API competitiva ($2/$10 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
- Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.45 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 28K | 36K |
Especificações Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | grok-4-20-reasoning-latest | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | xAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-03 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | November 2025 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Colossus-Scale Reasoning Sparse MoE | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 1000K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.75/1M tokens | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Real-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code Execution | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | xAI Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 4 Argon: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 68 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 95 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper at $1.47 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.63 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 4 Argon has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 0.98s.
Veredito
Tanto Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (Indicado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Gemini 4 Argon (Indicado para compreensão multimodal nativa de texto e imagem e leitura visual de documentos, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Gemini 4 Argon lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Gemini 4 Argon oferece geração mais rápida e Gemini 4 Argon apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.
Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)
Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) ou Gemini 4 Argon?+
Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Gemini 4 Argon leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.
Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) ou Gemini 4 Argon?+
O Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) custa $3.00 / $15.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Gemini 4 Argon custa $2.00 / $10.00. No custo combinado, Gemini 4 Argon é mais econômico.
Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+
O Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) suporta 1M tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do Gemini 4 Argon, enquanto Gemini 4 Argon entrega maior velocidade de geração.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Argon: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Command A Plus vs. Gemini 4 Argon: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- DeepSeek V4.1-Flash vs. Gemini 4 Argon: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
- Gemini 4 Argon vs. Claude Fable 5.1: Comparação de Benchmarks, Preços API e Velocidade (2026)Comparar
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da xAI e Google e benchmarks independentes (2026).