Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Devstral 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Devstral 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Devstral 2 da Mistral AI e Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct da Alibaba são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Devstral 2 oferece uma janela de contexto de 262.1K tokens a $1.50/$4.50 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct oferece 262.1K tokens de contexto a $0.00/$0.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Devstral 2

IA Agêntica e Uso de Ferramentas

O Devstral 2 da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, oferecendo janela de contexto de 262K, velocidade de 70 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 56/100 e tar

Intelligence Index56 / 100
Input Token:

$1.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$4.50 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

58.2%

Alibaba

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct da Alibaba é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 262K, velocidade de 52 tokens/s, índice de inteligênc

Intelligence Index86 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

56.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Devstral 2 is faster at 70 tok/s vs 52 tok/s.
  • Devstral 2 leads on SWE-bench coding (58.2% vs 56.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureDevstral 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5686
Provider
Mistral AIAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.50 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$4.50 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.99 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
70 tok/s52 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
58.2%56.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
66.5%70%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.35 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Devstral 2
+1.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Devstral 2
+35% faster generation
Context
Tied
262.1K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Devstral 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

58.2%vs56.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

66.5%vs70%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83.5%vs83%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1365ptsvs1355pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

52%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

78%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

82%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

70 tok/s vs52 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Devstral 20.52s
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct0.76s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Devstral 27.66s
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct10.38s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Devstral 2 Monthly API Bill
$6.82 / month
$1.5/1M in · $4.5/1M out
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct saves approximately $6.82 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Devstral 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 262K com limite máximo de saída de 66K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 58.2% · GPQA Diamond 66.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 70 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 520 ms
  • Pesos abertos (123B) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 262K com limite máximo de saída de 16K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 56.5% · GPQA Diamond 70%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 52 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 760 ms
  • Pesos abertos (480B total (35B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricDevstral 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.65$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
42K25K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
20K9K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureDevstral 2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Official API Model ID (SDK)devstral-2-latestqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-122025-04
Knowledge CutoffOctober 2025March 2025
ArchitectureAdvanced Agentic Code TransformerCode-Specialized Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer
Parameters123B480B total (35B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 262K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.35/1M tokensAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 76 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 264 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 298 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1032 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Devstral 2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Devstral 2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is more intelligent. It scores 86 compared with 56 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Devstral 2 is faster, generating 70 tokens per second compared with 52 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.99 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Devstral 2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.52s compared with 0.76s.

Veredito

Tanto Devstral 2 (Indicado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Devstral 2 oferece geração mais rápida e Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Devstral 2 ou Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Devstral 2 ou Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?+

O Devstral 2 custa $1.50 / $4.50 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct custa $0.00 / $0.00. No custo combinado, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Devstral 2 suporta 262.1K tokens de contexto contra 262.1K tokens do Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct, enquanto Devstral 2 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Mistral AI e Alibaba e benchmarks independentes (2026).